2016
DOI: 10.1515/crelle-2015-0109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetric differentials and variations of Hodge structures

Abstract: Let D be a simple normal crossing divisor in a smooth complex projective variety X. We show that the existence on X-D of a non-trivial polarized complex variation of Hodge structures with integral monodromy implies that the pair (X,D) has a non-zero logarithmic symmetric dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(46 reference statements)
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0 is a weakly positive sheaf by [PW16, Theorem 4.8] (an easy consequence of the results of [Zuo00] and [Bru15] in the unipotent case), so this would imply that F −1 0 is also a pseudoeffective line bundle, a contradiction.…”
Section: Main Construction On Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0 is a weakly positive sheaf by [PW16, Theorem 4.8] (an easy consequence of the results of [Zuo00] and [Bru15] in the unipotent case), so this would imply that F −1 0 is also a pseudoeffective line bundle, a contradiction.…”
Section: Main Construction On Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The argument is in fact simpler, as no torsion issues arise. The weak positivity of [PW] (see Theorem 4.9 and its proof, a step towards the proof of Theorem 18.1) as a quick corollary of the results of [Zuo00] and [Bru15].…”
Section: Positivity For Hodge Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that there is a more general result, which holds at each step of the Hodge filtration; this is very useful for applications. It has its origin in previous results of Zuo [Zuo00] and Brunebarbe [Bru15], which are analogous Griffiths-type metric statements in the setting of Deligne canonical extensions over a simple normal crossings boundary. Concretely, for each p we have a natural Kodaira-Spencer type O X -module homomorphism One can show that Theorem 4.3 implies Theorem 4.1 via duality arguments.…”
Section: Weak Positivitymentioning
confidence: 73%