2015
DOI: 10.1362/146934715x14503490536028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetric and asymmetric effects of primary healthcare attributes on patient satisfaction: Do they vary across patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found that respondents’ level of education negatively influences the overall evaluation of the services provided. This result is in line with Giovanis and Pierrakos (2015). Clients with a higher level of education tend to be more demanding and critical in relation to services provided.…”
Section: Presentation and Analysis Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also found that respondents’ level of education negatively influences the overall evaluation of the services provided. This result is in line with Giovanis and Pierrakos (2015). Clients with a higher level of education tend to be more demanding and critical in relation to services provided.…”
Section: Presentation and Analysis Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Regarding the use of PRCA for evaluating the nonlinear impact of service dimensions on users’ general evaluation regarding the quality of healthcare services, Giovanis et al (2014) and Giovanis and Pierrakos (2015) conducted an empirical study concerning 407 service users, exploring four dimensions: nursing care, facilities’ conditions, medical care, and administration services and staff. They found that nursing care and medical care have a higher reward than penalty impact, although both are statistically significant.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is the transaction-specific, whereby satisfaction antecedes service quality. In health-care services, most empirical work corroborates the dominant quality-affectssatisfaction view (Dagger et al, 2007;Raposo et al, 2009;Chahal and Kumari, 2012;Ladhari and Rigaux-Bricmont, 2013;Chen and Fu, 2015;Giovanis and Pierrakos, 2015;Shabbir et al, 2016;Meesala and Paul, 2016). The theoretical support is based on Bagozzi's (1992) appraisal-emotional response-coping attitudinal framework, as service quality is conceptualized as a cognitively oriented construct, while satisfaction is mainly conceptualized as an affective construct (Brady et al, 2005).…”
Section: Empirical Justification Of the Service Quality Indexmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the same context, Raposo et al (2009) identified medical care, nursing care, administrative services and staff and facilities conditions as key determinants of primary health-care service quality. Moreover, Giovanis and Pierrakos (2015) used the four service quality attributes, which were proposed by Hospital outpatient services Raposo et al (2009), to investigate the asymmetric effects of primary health-care service quality on patient satisfaction including the role of patients' characteristics on the nature of these relationships. Finally, Zarei (2015) identified eight dimensions of primary health-care service quality including physician consultation, information to patient, physical environment, service cost and efficiency of administration services (i.e.…”
Section: Ijqss 102mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation