2016
DOI: 10.5603/kp.a2015.0192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symetis Acurate Neo transfemoral aortic bioprosthesis — initial Polish experience

Abstract: A b s t r a c tBackground and aim: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven to be a valuable alternative to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk and surgically inoperable patients who suffer from severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. With the second generation of TAVI devices improvements in both handling and performance are highly demanded. This brief clinical communication reports the first Polish experience with the second generation of transfemoral TAVI device -Symetis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to properly anchor the valve within the aortic annulus, the inflow (subannular) portion of the ACURATE‐ neo TM valve protrudes into the LVOT; but notably, the radial force of this device appears to be less than the CoreValve ® and thus, may account for the lower rate of heart‐bock. The present series shows a relatively low (5.3%) rate of PPI and is comparable to the results of Maeda et al 6.7%, Zembala et al , 0% using the ACURATE‐ neo TM and also compares favorable with the ACURATE‐TA TM registry reporting 10% rate or PPI .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to properly anchor the valve within the aortic annulus, the inflow (subannular) portion of the ACURATE‐ neo TM valve protrudes into the LVOT; but notably, the radial force of this device appears to be less than the CoreValve ® and thus, may account for the lower rate of heart‐bock. The present series shows a relatively low (5.3%) rate of PPI and is comparable to the results of Maeda et al 6.7%, Zembala et al , 0% using the ACURATE‐ neo TM and also compares favorable with the ACURATE‐TA TM registry reporting 10% rate or PPI .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Importantly, our initial experience using the transfemoral ACURATE‐ neo TM shows 100% procedural success as well as 0% mortality rate at 30 days and 9 months. These results are comparable to those of Maeda et al reporting a 30‐day and 6‐month mortality rate of 0 and 6.7%, respectively, and Zembala et al reporting 0% mortality at 30 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are consistent with our experiences, both with CV and Evolut R prostheses. Similar outcomes were reported in the case of the new Acurate valve generation, as was mentioned before [41]. Only in the case of the new ES prosthesis generation (Sapien 3, ES3) was a higher rate of postprocedural conduction abnormalities and PPM implantations reported when compared to the Sapien XT devices.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Conduction Disturbancessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The new version of the Acurate device (Symetis Acurate Neo) implanted via the transfemoral route seems to be less harmful for the conduction system. In the published data the periprocedural PPM implantation rate was not higher than 9% [4143]. …”
Section: Risk Factors For Conduction Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%