2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-31980-1_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic Test Selection Based on Approximate Analysis

Abstract: Abstract. This paper addresses the problem of generating symbolic test cases for testing the conformance of a black-box implementation with respect to a specification, in the context of reactive systems. The challenge we consider is the selection of test cases according to a test purpose, which is here a set of scenarios of interest that one wants to observe during test execution. Because of the interactions that occur between the test case and the implementation, test execution can be seen as a game involving… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each operation on sets is performed by a predicate transformer (for example Pre δ (B) is given by the set of states ν, which satisfy the predicate transformer ∃ν ∈ B : (ν ∈ G δ ) ∧ (ν = A δ (ν)). Details can be found in Le Gall et al (2005) and in Jeannet et al (2005).…”
Section: Symbolic Transition Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each operation on sets is performed by a predicate transformer (for example Pre δ (B) is given by the set of states ν, which satisfy the predicate transformer ∃ν ∈ B : (ν ∈ G δ ) ∧ (ν = A δ (ν)). Details can be found in Le Gall et al (2005) and in Jeannet et al (2005).…”
Section: Symbolic Transition Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pre T δ (B) is given by the set of states ν which satisfy the predicate transformer ∃ν ∈ B : (ν ∈ G δ ) ∧ (ν = A δ (ν)). Further details can be found in Le Gall et al (2005); Jeannet et al (2005).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As both problems are undecidable for IOSTS, syntactical transformations are guided by over-approximations using abstract interpretation techniques. Nevertheless, these over-approximations still ensure soundness of test cases [26]. These techniques are implemented in the STG tool (see 5.1), with an interface with NBAC used for abstract interpretation.…”
Section: Automatic Test Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%