1973
DOI: 10.2307/2346786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic Description of Factorial Models for Analysis of Variance

Abstract: Summary The paper describes the symbolic notation and syntax for specifying factorial models for analysis of variance in the control language of the genstat statistical program system at Rothamsted. The notation generalizes that of Nelder (1965). Algorithm AS 65 (Rogers, 1973) converts factorial model formulae in this notation to a list of model terms represented as binary integers. A further extension of the syntax is discussed for specifying models generally (including non‐linear forms).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
450
0
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 714 publications
(486 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
450
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Notation for factorial models is as in Wilkinson & Rogers (1973). Analyses of variance were used to examine the significance of fixed effects (Genus*Habit* Shade) at the plant (Block.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notation for factorial models is as in Wilkinson & Rogers (1973). Analyses of variance were used to examine the significance of fixed effects (Genus*Habit* Shade) at the plant (Block.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All constrained components were used in reporting the results, and thus reduced-rank was not used because treatment effects were present on all axes, as judged by the relative magnitude of the eigenvalues of the constrained axes. The human model focused on the within-person tissue-dependent effects of isoflavone supplementation compared to placebo with the following model formula (Wilkinson & Rogers, 1973 Four different sets of significantly changed genes were used as dependent variables in the multivariate analysis; all significantly changed genes in 1) human PBMCs, 2) human WAT, 3)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the experiments and analysis used an approach known as "factorial design" (Yates and Mather, 1963;Fisher, 1926;Hill and Lewicki, 2005;Wilkinson and Rogers, 1973;Benestad et al, 2010), where a factorial regression was used to assess which influence each of the choices in the model setup has on the forecasts. It is a technique that can analyse sets of factors which are considered to have potential effects on the outcome in experiments, where an analysis of variance (ANOVA; Wilks, 1995) provides estimates for error bars and the level of statistical significance.…”
Section: The Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%