2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14770-8_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic Classification Methods for Patient Discharge Summaries Encoding into ICD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies exist that used SNOMED-CT (Cornet and de Keizer, 2008;Lussier et al, 2001), UMLS (Friedman et al, 2004), ICF (Kukafka et al, 2006) and procedure classification (ICD-10-PCS) (Subotin and Davis, 2014). The corpora of clinical records used in previous studies ranged from admission notes (Gundersen et al, 1996) to radiology or pathology reports (Aronson et al, 2007;Crammer et al, 2007;Farkas and Szarvas, 2008;Goldstein et al, 2007;Matykiewicz et al, 2006;Oleynik et al, 2017;Rizzo et al, 2015;Suominen et al, 2008;Zhang, 2008), discharge summaries (Delamarre et al, 1995;Dinwoodie and Howell, 1973;Franz et al, 2000;Friedman et al, 2004;Kevers and Medori, 2010;Kukafka et al, 2006;Larkey and Croft, 1995;Li et al, 2011;Lussier et al, 2000,0;Medori and Fairon, 2010), death certificates (Koopman et al, 2015,1) and entire medical records (Kavuluru et al, 2015;Lita et al, 2008;Morris et al, 2000;Pakhomov et al, 2006;Ruch et al, 2008), with variable structure and level of curation. Moreover, the majority of studies has been based on English texts, with the exception of particular studies in French (Kevers and Medori, 2010;Medori and Fairon, 2010;Pereira et al, 2006;Ruch et al, 2008), Spanish (Pérez et al, 2015), Italian …”
Section: Review Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies exist that used SNOMED-CT (Cornet and de Keizer, 2008;Lussier et al, 2001), UMLS (Friedman et al, 2004), ICF (Kukafka et al, 2006) and procedure classification (ICD-10-PCS) (Subotin and Davis, 2014). The corpora of clinical records used in previous studies ranged from admission notes (Gundersen et al, 1996) to radiology or pathology reports (Aronson et al, 2007;Crammer et al, 2007;Farkas and Szarvas, 2008;Goldstein et al, 2007;Matykiewicz et al, 2006;Oleynik et al, 2017;Rizzo et al, 2015;Suominen et al, 2008;Zhang, 2008), discharge summaries (Delamarre et al, 1995;Dinwoodie and Howell, 1973;Franz et al, 2000;Friedman et al, 2004;Kevers and Medori, 2010;Kukafka et al, 2006;Larkey and Croft, 1995;Li et al, 2011;Lussier et al, 2000,0;Medori and Fairon, 2010), death certificates (Koopman et al, 2015,1) and entire medical records (Kavuluru et al, 2015;Lita et al, 2008;Morris et al, 2000;Pakhomov et al, 2006;Ruch et al, 2008), with variable structure and level of curation. Moreover, the majority of studies has been based on English texts, with the exception of particular studies in French (Kevers and Medori, 2010;Medori and Fairon, 2010;Pereira et al, 2006;Ruch et al, 2008), Spanish (Pérez et al, 2015), Italian …”
Section: Review Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the majority of studies has been based on English texts, with the exception of particular studies in French (Kevers and Medori, 2010;Medori and Fairon, 2010;Pereira et al, 2006;Ruch et al, 2008), Spanish (Pérez et al, 2015), Italian (Chiaravalloti et al, 2014;Rizzo et al, 2015) or German (Franz et al, 2000), while information extraction from Portuguese medical texts is still emmerging (Ferreira, 2011;Rijo et al, 2014). The scope of clinical conditions comprised in each study also varied greatly, ranging from limited sets of respiratory (Farkas and Szarvas, 2008), cerebrovascular (Li et al, 2011) or coronarography exams (Delamarre et al, 1995) to heterogeneous episodes (Kevers and Medori, 2010). Such variable scope has also been reflected on the range of codes considered -one (principal diagnosis) (Avillach et al, 2008), five (Lita et al, 2008), six (Li et al, 2011), twenty (Yan et al, 2010) or fifty (Xu et al, 2007) codes, with only one study considering a significantly larger number of codes (more than 1,400 codes) (Medori and Fairon, 2010).…”
Section: Review Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current automated clinical coding approaches for patient discharge files and radiology reports can be divided into handcrafted, 8,9 machine learning, and hybrid approaches, 10,11 with handcrafted and hybrid approaches being the most successful. 12 A literature review conducted by Stanfill et al 13 concluded that, while some systems show excellent results, most of them are used in controlled settings, often using normalized data and keeping a limited scope (eg, radiology reports).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless coding is done by the discharging physician, there is a certain backlog (of days or weeks, and sometimes months) between patient discharge and coding. Although semi-automated ICD coding systems have been proposed [188][189][190][191][192][193] …”
Section: Independent Variables Excluded a Priorimentioning
confidence: 99%