2015
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2015.32.3.254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbolic and Motor Contributions to Vocal Imitation in Absolute Pitch

Abstract: THE LINKED DUAL REPRESENTATION MODEL (Hutchins & Moreno, 2013) was designed to provide an account for the broad pattern of relationships between vocal perception and production, including both correlations and dissociations between the two. This model makes a unique prediction that musicians with absolute pitch (AP) should be biased towards compensating for objectively mistuned notes in a single note imitation task. In this paper, we tested this prediction by asking musicians with and without AP to imitate voc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that AP possessors not only rely on verbal information during pitch labeling but also on sensorimotor codes (e.g., specific vocalization or fingering unambiguously coupled to specific tone responses). 33 Consistent with this framework and our findings, AP possessors show an interference when vocally imitating mistuned tones 101 and a stronger left hemispheric activation during the processing of auditory feedback for vocal motor control. 102 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There is evidence that AP possessors not only rely on verbal information during pitch labeling but also on sensorimotor codes (e.g., specific vocalization or fingering unambiguously coupled to specific tone responses). 33 Consistent with this framework and our findings, AP possessors show an interference when vocally imitating mistuned tones 101 and a stronger left hemispheric activation during the processing of auditory feedback for vocal motor control. 102 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There is evidence that AP possessors not only rely on verbal information during pitch labeling but also on sensorimotor codes (e.g., specific vocalization or fingering unambiguously coupled to specific tone responses) [29]. Consistent with this framework and our findings, AP possessors show an interference when vocally imitating mistuned tones [97] and a stronger left hemispheric activation during the processing of auditory feedback for vocal motor control [98].…”
Section: Pitch Labeling: a Case For The "Dorsal Stream" Functionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This suggests that AP possessors outperform non-AP possessors on such pitch memory tasks because they can remember a category label, not because they remember the fine-grained details of the pitch. In production, AP possessors are biased in their reproduction of mistuned pitches, such that they are more likely to produce a pitch that conforms to an in-tune note, particularly with longer intervals between hearing the note and producing the note (Hutchins, Hutka, & Moreno, 2015). To be clear, these kinds of results suggest that there is no difference in auditory sensory processing for AP and non-AP possessors, and further, there is no difference in longterm pitch memory between AP and non-AP possessors, at least when the pitches cannot be differentiated at the note category level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%