1996
DOI: 10.1006/inco.1996.0090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbol–Relation Grammars: A Formalism for Graphical Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A second category uses relationships among visual symbols at a high level of abstraction. In this category we have Symbol-Relation Grammars (SRs) [Ferrucci et al 1996], Hypergraph Grammars Minas [1997Minas [ , 2002, and Layered Graph Grammars (LGGs) Schürr [1996, 1997]. Some of these grammar formalisms fall into the category of graph grammars, since they model visual sentences as graph-like structures.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second category uses relationships among visual symbols at a high level of abstraction. In this category we have Symbol-Relation Grammars (SRs) [Ferrucci et al 1996], Hypergraph Grammars Minas [1997Minas [ , 2002, and Layered Graph Grammars (LGGs) Schürr [1996, 1997]. Some of these grammar formalisms fall into the category of graph grammars, since they model visual sentences as graph-like structures.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symbol-Relation Grammars (SR) views a visual sentence as a set of symbol occurrences and a set of relational items over symbol occurrences [Ferrucci et al 1996]. The drawback of this approach is that the membership problem for the whole class of SR languages is NP-hard, although several subclasses have been defined in order to reduce parsing inefficiency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positional grammars directly extend the traditional context-free grammars introducing more general spatial relations other than string concatenation. Related works and comparative discussions about grammatical formalisms for the description of visual languages can be found in Ferrucci, Pacini, Satta, Sessa, Tortora, Tucci and Vitiello (1996), Tucci, Vitiello and Costagliola (1994), Wittenburg (1992), Marriott (1994) and Golin (1991).…”
Section: Specifying Two-dimensional Language Syntaxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual Programming Languages (VPLs), which usually handle objects that do not possess inherent visual representation [1], have been frequently utilized in many fields of computer science including software engineering. Various approaches have been proposed to formally specify and parsing VPLs [2][3][4]. As a natural extension of formal grammar theory, graph grammars offer the mechanisms for formal specification and parsing of VPLs [5], just like formal grammars do for string languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%