2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-010-9983-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbol Error Rate Analysis and Power Allocation for Adaptive Relay Selection Schemes

Abstract: In this paper, we analyse the symbol error rate (SER) performance of adaptive relay selection schemes (ARS) in a general dual-hop multiple-relay network. Specifically, we provide a closed-form SER expression for ARS which is tight over the whole signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) region. In addition, the derived SER can be readily extended to conventional relay selection schemes, i.e. amplify-and-forward relay selection (AF-RS), perfect decode-andforward relay selection (PDF-RS), adaptive decode-and-forward relay sel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimized SER based optimum power allocation with best relay selection for multi relay AF network is proposed in [6]. The authors introduced optimum power allocation schemes based on SER for adaptive relaying schemes in dual hop multi relay cooperative network in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimized SER based optimum power allocation with best relay selection for multi relay AF network is proposed in [6]. The authors introduced optimum power allocation schemes based on SER for adaptive relaying schemes in dual hop multi relay cooperative network in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the above‐described disadvantages of the AF and DF protocols, various improved cooperative transmission protocols have been proposed, such as signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) threshold‐based selective digital relaying schemes [6, 10–12], cooperative maximum ratio combining (MRC)‐based DF [13, 14] and smart relaying scheme [15, 16], log‐likelihood‐ratio threshold‐based selective DF [17] and decode‐amplify‐forward [18, 19]. A hybrid forward (HF) protocol was proposed in [8, 9, 20–23], which provides superior performance than both the AF and the DF protocols and thus has received lots of attention recently. In [8, 9], the author studied the symbol error rate (SER) of the HF protocol by adaptively choosing the AF and the DF protocols on a per symbol basis, which is, however, hard to realise in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%