2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2003.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symbol–digit substitution and individual differences in visual search ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the computerized version of the Digit Symbol Substitution Tests (DSST) [ 36 , 37 ] was adapted for the scanning procedure to test psychomotor speed, following a protocol described previously [ 38 , 39 ]. The paradigm tests motor speed, response selection [ 40 ], shifting of attention [ 41 ], and perceptual speed [ 42 , 43 ]. Psychomotor speed is used to actively maintain and manipulate information over a brief period of time and to allocate attentional resources among competing subtasks [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the computerized version of the Digit Symbol Substitution Tests (DSST) [ 36 , 37 ] was adapted for the scanning procedure to test psychomotor speed, following a protocol described previously [ 38 , 39 ]. The paradigm tests motor speed, response selection [ 40 ], shifting of attention [ 41 ], and perceptual speed [ 42 , 43 ]. Psychomotor speed is used to actively maintain and manipulate information over a brief period of time and to allocate attentional resources among competing subtasks [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the larger distraction effect on SDST are not clear, but may be related to its greater demands on visual search, working memory, or reference memory (Gilmore, Royer, Gruhn, & Esson, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This brief report is only one step in understanding the factors that influence group differences on tests of processing speed (see discussions by Ecksenberger, 1973;Hertzog & Bleckley, 2001). We have experiments underway to better understand how information load (e.g., string length) may interact with distractibility to influence both mean RT and variability (see also Faust et al, 1999;Gilmore et al, 2004). Future studies including groups (e.g., children, people with low working memory spans) with intact sensory function but who are thought to have deficits in both inhibition and speed will be important for understanding the size and generality of the distraction effect on speed tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correct responses were recorded. The DSST has high test-retest reliability and high discriminant validity between people with different levels of short-term memory and search ability (Gilmore, Royer, Gruhn, & Esson, 2004).…”
Section: Cognitive Visuomotor Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%