1990
DOI: 10.1016/0163-6383(90)90041-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syllables as signals for 2-day-old infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consonant with previous findings that newborns did not show a preference for their own fathers' voices over other unfamiliar male voices in spite of their ability to discriminate them (DeCasper & Prescott, 1984). In contrast to these data with fathers' voices, infants prefer to listen to the maternal voice even when heard in a variety of different contexts (Cooper et al, 1997;DeCasper & Fifer, 1980;Fifer, 1987;Mehler, Bertoncini, Barriere, & JassikGerschenfeld, 1978;Mills & Melhuish, 1974;Moon & Fifer, 1990;Standley & Madsen, 1990). Therefore, it was surprising that 4-month-olds did not attend more to their fathers' voices over other male voices, especially when the fathers' voices were extracted from the context of normal father -infant interactions (i.e., ID speech).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are consonant with previous findings that newborns did not show a preference for their own fathers' voices over other unfamiliar male voices in spite of their ability to discriminate them (DeCasper & Prescott, 1984). In contrast to these data with fathers' voices, infants prefer to listen to the maternal voice even when heard in a variety of different contexts (Cooper et al, 1997;DeCasper & Fifer, 1980;Fifer, 1987;Mehler, Bertoncini, Barriere, & JassikGerschenfeld, 1978;Mills & Melhuish, 1974;Moon & Fifer, 1990;Standley & Madsen, 1990). Therefore, it was surprising that 4-month-olds did not attend more to their fathers' voices over other male voices, especially when the fathers' voices were extracted from the context of normal father -infant interactions (i.e., ID speech).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Newborn infants may recognize their mothers' faces, even when extraneous cues (e.g., olfactory and/or movement) and contrast cues (e.g., hair and complexion) are controlled (Bushnell, Sai, & Mullin, 1989;Field, 1985;Sherrod, 1979;Walton, Bower, & Bower, 1992). Similarly, preference for the maternal voice appears early in development (DeCasper & Fifer, 1980;Fifer, 1987;Hepper, Scott, & Shahidullah, 1993;Mills & Melhuish, 1974;Moon & Fifer, 1990;Ockleford, Vince, Layton, & Reader, 1988;Standley & Madsen, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these skills are acquired at different times during development (Jusczyk, 1993), it appears that newborn infants already possess remarkable discriminatory capabilities: Two-day-old infants can discriminate between stop consonant contrasts (e.g., ba vs. da) and between following vowel contrasts (e.g., ba vs. bi; Bertoncini, Bijeljac-Babic, Blumstein, & Mehler, 1987), and by 4 days postnatal age, infants can encode sufficiently detailed information to detect the addition of a new syllable to a set of familiar ones (Jusczyk, Bertoncini, BijeljacBabic, Kennedy, & Mehler, 1990). In fact, there are data that suggest that prenatal auditory experience may have an important influence on early speech perception: Three- -Accepted by previous editor, Myron L. Braunstein day-old infants prefer their mothers' voices to those of unfamiliar females (DeCasper & Fifer, 1980;Moon & Fifer, 1990) but have no preference for their fathers' voices (DeCasper & Prescott, 1984); neonates prefer to listen to speech in the parental language, as opposed to speech in a foreign language (Moon, Cooper, & Fifer, 1993); infants at 2 days postnatal age prefer, over a novel story, passages that had been recited by their mothers prenatally (DeCasper & Spence, 1986); and even infants <2 h old, who thus have little postnatal auditory experience, prefer the voices of their mothers to those of five other female voices (Querleu, Renard, Boutteville, & Crepin, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, sensitivity to rhythmic patterning is in place very early. So indeed is sensitivity to other aspects of prosodic structure [infants prefer pauses to be placed between rather than within prosodic phrases (54), for instance], as well as discriminatory preference of licit (e.g., tap) over illicit (tfp) sequences of consonants and vowels (55,56). It is thus not unreasonable to propose that the infant notes many systematic properties of speech input before being able to settle on candidate phonemic contrasts and other phonological structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%