Syed Ahmad and His Two Books Called ‘Asar-al-Sanadid’

Abstract

The earliest writings of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan (1817–1898), the famous Muslim social reformer and educationist, were in the field of History, including two books on the monuments and history of Delhi that bear the same title, Asar-al-Sanadid. This paper compares the first book, published in 1847, with the second, published in 1854, to discover the author's ambitions for each. How do the two books differ from some of the earlier books of relatively similar nature in Persian and Urdu? How radically different are the two books from each other, and why? How and why were they written, and what particular audiences could the author have had in mind in each instance? How were the two books actually received by the public? And, finally, what changes do the two books reflect in the author's thinking? These are the chief questions that this paper seeks to explore.

Akbar’s Dream: The Mughal Emperor in Nineteenth-Century Literature

“…Syed Ahmad himself lived in Agra for three years (1839-1841) and then moved to Fatehpur Sikri, where he set up residence in Akbar's old khwabgah or bedchamber. 77 Naim writes, "One can easily imagine him looking at the dimly visible paintings and thinking of the Emperor who had commissioned them, and who once had his most private moments-with wives and scholars alike-in that room." 78 Perhaps so.…”

Nostalgia and the City: Urdushahr āshobpoetry in the aftermath of 1857

“…C. M. Naim, Faisal Devji and Margrit Pernau, for instance, have argued that this new approach to monuments had been encouraged by Western scholars, officers and tourists interested in the historical heritage and spatial mapping of north Indian cities. 62 One of the first works that conceptualised the city as a primarily built environment was Mirza Sangin Beg's Sair al-Manāzil ("A Walk through the Houses") composed in 1820 and possibly commissioned by Thomas Metcalfe. 63 In 1824, Lalah Sil Chand compiled his Tafrīh .…”

Quarantined histories: Sindh and the question of historiography in Colonial India—Part II

“…It is against this intellectual background that a genealogy of techniques of history writing as a modern discipline start to take shape in vernacular languages like Urdu and Sindhi. Scholars of Urdu literature generally comment on Syed Ahmad Khan (1817–1898)'s 1839 Jam‐i Jam and his Asar al‐Sanadid (1847 and 1854) as likely candidates for the transition from the tradition of Persian historical writing to that of the new disciplinary history (Naim, ; Lelyveld, ).…”