2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SWP-LeafNET: A novel multistage approach for plant leaf identification based on deep CNN

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Flavia dataset, as shown in Table 9, the proposed algorithm achieves a classification accuracy of 99.3%, which is in the third place and little lower than the accuracy of 99.65% obtained by Wu et al 38 combining shape IMTD and convolutional features (VGG16 + ReLU5_2) and 99.67% obtained by Ali et al 39 modeling a botanist's behavior in leaf identification by proposing a highly efficient method of maximum behavioral resemblance developed through three deep learning-based models (SWP-LeafNET). The Pearline's 32 and Ganguly's 51 methods based on deep learning performs slightly poor and obtains a classification accuracy of 98.7%, lower than the proposed algorithm.…”
Section: Overall Evaluation Of the Plant Classification Systemmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the Flavia dataset, as shown in Table 9, the proposed algorithm achieves a classification accuracy of 99.3%, which is in the third place and little lower than the accuracy of 99.65% obtained by Wu et al 38 combining shape IMTD and convolutional features (VGG16 + ReLU5_2) and 99.67% obtained by Ali et al 39 modeling a botanist's behavior in leaf identification by proposing a highly efficient method of maximum behavioral resemblance developed through three deep learning-based models (SWP-LeafNET). The Pearline's 32 and Ganguly's 51 methods based on deep learning performs slightly poor and obtains a classification accuracy of 98.7%, lower than the proposed algorithm.…”
Section: Overall Evaluation Of the Plant Classification Systemmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The recognition results on nine benchmark leaf datasets for the unsupervised leaf image retrieval and supervised leaf image classification are better than prior state-of-the-art plant identification approaches. Beikmohammadi et al 39 proposed a highly efficient method of maximum behavioral resemblance developed through three deep learning-based models to model a botanist's behavior, in which the first and second models are designed from scratch, and the third model employed the pre-trained architecture MobileNetV2 along with the transfer-learning technique. S-LeafNET, W-LeafNET, and P-LeafNET is distributable and considerably faster than other methods because of using shallower models with fewer parameters asynchronously.…”
Section: Contour-based Shape Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, to build an reliable system, the authors of [57] have proposed an efficient method of behavioral similarity developed through three models based on deep learning. To train their models, they have used the MalayaKew dataset that includes 44 classes of plant species and the FLavia dataset that contains 32 plant species.…”
Section: Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this manual identification process is labor-intensive and prone to subjective misunderstandings, introducing a risk of misinterpretation [7]. In view of this, numerous researchers have proposed intelligent recognition methods for plant diseases, and they have used CNN models to classify plant images with good recognition results [8][9][10][11][12][13]. These plant images are categorized based on their background into two types: natural background images and pure background images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%