2024
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54493-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SWOT analysis of the models used by social enterprises in scaling effective refractive error coverage to achieve the 2030 in SIGHT in Kenya

Shadrack Muma,
Kovin Shunmugam Naidoo,
Rekha Hansraj

Abstract: Uncorrected refractive error has predominantly been delivered through commercial entrepreneurship in Kenya. However, to achieve the 2030 IN SIGHT, integration of other forms of entrepreneurship such as the social entrepreneurship is desirable to supplement the efforts of the dominant commercial entrepreneurship. Therefore, this study intended to undertake a SWOT analysis of the current models used by social enterprises in scaling effective refractive error coverage to achieve the 2030 IN SIGHT in Kenya. A revi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…dynamic factors of influence, in addition to the more static internal strengths and weaknesses of the product lines 60 . Cultivating collective awareness of, and developing responses to, potential “opportunity” and “threat” scenarios, or the use of other collaborative scenario planning methods, can support TLBMC application in a way that acknowledges local, regional, and global system dynamics, helping communities to make sense of specific challenges, and develop appropriate strategies 60 62 . To further extend the TLBMC framework to capture dynamics and evolutionary pathways as biochar systems mature, stakeholders should incorporate dynamic components to represent known evolving factors and feedback loops, such as: emerging technologies, market dynamics, regulatory changes, and social and environmental change projections 63 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dynamic factors of influence, in addition to the more static internal strengths and weaknesses of the product lines 60 . Cultivating collective awareness of, and developing responses to, potential “opportunity” and “threat” scenarios, or the use of other collaborative scenario planning methods, can support TLBMC application in a way that acknowledges local, regional, and global system dynamics, helping communities to make sense of specific challenges, and develop appropriate strategies 60 62 . To further extend the TLBMC framework to capture dynamics and evolutionary pathways as biochar systems mature, stakeholders should incorporate dynamic components to represent known evolving factors and feedback loops, such as: emerging technologies, market dynamics, regulatory changes, and social and environmental change projections 63 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%