Surveys in Combinatorics 2017 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781108332699.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switching techniques for edge decompositions of graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof Start with a (3, λ)-GDD of type n 3 c 1 . Then place a TS λ (n) on one group of size n. ✷ Lemma 4.6 There exists a ✸-ITS 2 (v; w, u, y; z 1 , z 2 ) for (v, w, u, y, z 1 , z 2 ) ∈ { (11,3,3,2,0,0), (11,4,3,2,1,0), (12,3,3,3,0,0), (13,3,3,4,0,0), (13,4,3,4,1,0), (14, 5, 4, 5, 2, 3), (18, 7, 4, 5, 2, 3), (22, 6, 6, 4, 0, 0), (23, 8, 7, 5, 2, 3), (23, 8, 7, 8, 2, 6), (24,8,6,6,2,0)}.…”
Section: Near the Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Proof Start with a (3, λ)-GDD of type n 3 c 1 . Then place a TS λ (n) on one group of size n. ✷ Lemma 4.6 There exists a ✸-ITS 2 (v; w, u, y; z 1 , z 2 ) for (v, w, u, y, z 1 , z 2 ) ∈ { (11,3,3,2,0,0), (11,4,3,2,1,0), (12,3,3,3,0,0), (13,3,3,4,0,0), (13,4,3,4,1,0), (14, 5, 4, 5, 2, 3), (18, 7, 4, 5, 2, 3), (22, 6, 6, 4, 0, 0), (23, 8, 7, 5, 2, 3), (23, 8, 7, 8, 2, 6), (24,8,6,6,2,0)}.…”
Section: Near the Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof By taking (n, c, λ) ∈ { (3,2,2), (3,3,2), (3,4,2), (6,4,2)}, apply Lemma 4.5 together with Theorem 1.1 and Lemma 4.2 to get the cases of (v, w, u, y, z 1 , z 2 ) ∈ { (11,3,3,2,0,0), (12,3,3,3,0,0), (13, 3, 3, 4, 0, 0), (22, 6, 6, 4, (1) a (3, λ)-IGDD of type (2m + l; m, l) 1 (3h; h, h) t−1 (2h; h, 0) s−t ,…”
Section: Near the Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This 'switching' method was first applied to packings of the complete graph [3][4][5], and has since been generalised to other graphs [6,12,14]. See [13] for a proof of Lemma 3 and a survey of switching techniques for graph decompositions. Lemma 3 ([13]).…”
Section: Notation and Proof Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%