“… , In the expanded kite form, these groups fold outward in an unsymmetrical fashion, creating two degenerate, equilibrating C 2 v -symmetric structures (kite 1 and kite 2). , In the C 4 v -symmetric vase form, the heteroaryl groups are oriented upward, forming an extended bowl-type structure with an internal cavity. Switching between vase and kite conformations was originally observed in response to changes in temperature. ,, The favorable solvation of the larger surface area makes the kite form predominant at low temperatures (≤213 K for 1 ), whereas this solvation becomes entropically disfavored at higher temperatures (≥293 K for 1 ), resulting in the transition to the more compact vase form. ,,, Many groups have focused on inducing conformational switching in response to a variety of other stimuli, including pH changes, metal ion concentration, solvent effects, ,, and the presence of guest molecules, ,, as well as studying the kinetics and thermodynamics of the vase–kite switching process. , Significantly, efficient guest binding occurs only in the vase conformation, whereas the kite form, which lacks a cavity, shows poor binding affinities for guests.…”