2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switching on auxiliary devices in vehicular fuel efficiency tests can help cut CO2 emissions by millions of tons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several strategies have been proposed, evaluated, and implemented to address the climate impact of car development in the past decades, which can be categorized largely into two transition pathways [18][19][20] : technology-oriented [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and demand-oriented pathways. [28][29][30][31] Along the technology-oriented transition pathway, fuel economy improvement [32][33][34] has long been the most effective and widely discussed strategy. This can be achieved mainly by lightweight design (e.g., substituting standard steel with aluminum, magnesium, or carbon fiber) to reduce curb weight and thus the drive-cycle energy use and emissions, [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] or by powertrain technology innovation (e.g., electrification) to reduce the fossil fuel use and increase efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies have been proposed, evaluated, and implemented to address the climate impact of car development in the past decades, which can be categorized largely into two transition pathways [18][19][20] : technology-oriented [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and demand-oriented pathways. [28][29][30][31] Along the technology-oriented transition pathway, fuel economy improvement [32][33][34] has long been the most effective and widely discussed strategy. This can be achieved mainly by lightweight design (e.g., substituting standard steel with aluminum, magnesium, or carbon fiber) to reduce curb weight and thus the drive-cycle energy use and emissions, [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] or by powertrain technology innovation (e.g., electrification) to reduce the fossil fuel use and increase efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SUEWS adopts static traffic EFs and neglects the relationship between traffic emission and T air as reported by Alvarez and Weilenmann (2012) and Fontaras et al (2017). In order to examine the impact of seasonal variation of T air in traffic emission, correction is conducted using the regression function following Zhang et al (2021), but only a marginal difference is seen at monthly scale: a difference of 3 % in winter, −2 % in spring, ∼ 0 % in summer, and −1 % in autumn. Therefore, we believe that the static traffic EFs adopted by SUEWS can provide reasonable traffic emission values without considering the seasonal dynamics of T air .…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…SUEWS adopts static traffic EFs, and neglects the relationship between traffic emission and T air as reported by Alvarez and Weilenmann (2012) and Fontaras et al (2017). In order to examine the impact of seasonal variation of T air in traffic emission, correction is conducted using the regression function following Zhang et al (2021), but only a marginal difference is seen at monthly scale: a difference of 3% in winter,…”
Section: Model Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%