2018
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.4088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switching linear parameter‐varying control with improved local performance and optimized switching surfaces

Abstract: This paper presents a novel approach to designing switching linear parametervarying (SLPV) controllers with improved local performance and an algorithm for optimizing switching surfaces to further improve the performance of the SLPV controllers. The design approach utilizes the weighted average of the local L 2 -gain bounds (representing the local performance) as the cost function to be minimized, whereas the maximum of the local L 2 -gain bounds (representing the worst-case performance over all subsets) is bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By solving the LMIs and rearranging the equations given in (29), it is then possible to calculate the controller matrices through…”
Section: Respectivelymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By solving the LMIs and rearranging the equations given in (29), it is then possible to calculate the controller matrices through…”
Section: Respectivelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed‐sensitivity design for an LPV AFR controller has been proposed in the work of Schulz et al Padé approximation is used for the delay and a parameter‐dependent weight is considered. Zhao and Nagamune have investigated the problem of optimal switching surfaces in the switching LPV controller design problem and its application to AFR control of an SI engine where the time delay is treated via the Padé approximation. The particle swarm optimization method is used to design an algorithm for optimizing the switching surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the issue on the inexact values of scheduling parameters has been increasingly studied in the area of LPV control. For instance, the inexact scheduling parameters have been considered in References 39 and 40 when carrying out the LPV controller design for both state‐feedback and output‐feedback cases, respectively. Moreover, a more general approach is proposed to deal with the additive and multiplicative uncertainties in Reference 41.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous design of switching surfaces and a switching LPV controller is tackled in some works. [32][33][34] On the other hand, the switched gain-scheduling control for discrete-time LPV system has been investigated by Zhao et al 35 The widely used assumption is that the exact values of the scheduling parameters are available. However, this assumption is impractical for real control applications due to the measurement errors or estimation inaccuracies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State‐dependent switching without online measurement of varying parameters and also using online measurement of scheduling parameters are considered in the presented methods by Deaecto et al 29 and by Yang et al, 30,31 respectively. Simultaneous design of switching surfaces and a switching LPV controller is tackled in some works 32‐34 . On the other hand, the switched gain‐scheduling control for discrete‐time LPV system has been investigated by Zhao et al 35 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%