Switching from cash to mobile payment: what's the hold-up?

Abstract

PurposeThis paper explores the reasons behind the slow uptake of mobile payment (m-payment) from a switching intention (SI) perspective. The antecedents of SI from cash to m-payment were explored using an integrated conceptual model of the push-pull-mooring (PPM) framework and the status quo bias (SQB) perspective.Design/methodology/approachA self-administered survey was used to collect data, which are empirically tested using SmartPLS 3.0.FindingsThe push factor was found to have an insignificant effect on SI to m-payment whereas the pull factor was significant. Furthermore, the results revealed that the two mooring variables have contrasting results as trust is not a significant determinant of SI to m-payment while perceived security and privacy (PSP) is. Additionally, all SQB-related relationships were found to be statistically significantOriginality/valueThis study determined the factors that play vital roles in the consumers' decision-making to transition from cash to m-payment. This was done via a uniquely developed conceptual model that incorporated the PPM framework with the SQB perspective.

The Dark Side of Mobile Learning via Social Media: How Bad Can It Get?

“…Multicollinearity for all constructs was assessed using the variance inflation factor (VIF). Since all VIF values (1.289 to 2.074) are below 5, this indicates that multicollinearity is not a problem in this study (Loh et al, 2020 ). With reference to Fig.…”

Can COVID-19 pandemic influence experience response in mobile learning?

“…With Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) through SmartPLS (Version 3.2.9) software, the research model of this study is examined. A variance-based approach is considered an effective method since this study focuses primarily on theory building ( Yadegaridehkordi et al, 2019 , Loh et al, 2020 ). Specifically, the paper combines the MTAM with pedagogical and technological influences.…”

Neuromanagement decision-making and cognitive algorithmic processes in the technological adoption of mobile commerce apps

“…Consumer trust, perceived value, buying predisposition, and satisfaction are instrumental in articulating behaviors, attitudes, and intentions to adopt mobile shopping (Anshari et al, 2021;Dewi et al, 2020;Ghazali et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2020;Sharma et al, 2018;Tarhini et al, 2019), constituting motivational factors in purchasing products and services (Cho & Son, 2019;Graf-Vlachy et al, 2018;Loh et al, 2021;Roy et al, 2020;Seeger et al, 2019;Touzani et al, 2018). Consumer use behavior in relation to mobile payment services and apps (Bhattacharya & Anand, 2019;Kaur et al, 2020;Rodríguez-Torrico et al, 2020) is configured by consumer perceived value and motivation, online convenience, continuance intention, and impulse buying behavior Kim et al, 2021;Patel et al, 2020).…”

“…Mobile payment services are progressively adopted (Bailey et al, 2020;Kalinić et al, 2020;Kaur et al, 2020;Liébana-Cabanillas et al, 2020;Loh et al, 2021;Patil et al, 2020;Sharma et al, 2018) for enhancing the scale, output, and relative importance of mobile shopping apps. Performance expectancy, grievance redressal, and intention to use constitute positive predictors of consumer use behavior in relation to mobile payment.…”