2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9520-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switching Between Everyday and Scientific Language

Abstract: The research reported here investigated the everyday and scientific repertoires of children involved in semi-structured, Piagetian interviews carried out to check their understanding of dynamic astronomical concepts like daytime and night-time. It focused on the switching taking place between embedded and disembedded thinking; on the imagery which subjects referred to in their verbal dialogue and their descriptions of drawings and play-dough models of the Earth, Sun and Moon; and it examined the prevalence and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students can frame arguments and give evidence for their ideas with everyday language (e.g., Berland et al, 2016;Christodoulou & Osborne, 2014) that allows them to authentically practice engineering (Jung & McFadden, 2018). In fact, young students' scientific understandings are often underestimated and misunderstood if assessment is based primarily on their language use (Bleicher, Tobin, & McRobbie, 2003;Blown & Bryce, 2016). The language of engineering can be improved as students develop more complex disciplinary knowledge.…”
Section: Teacher Talkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students can frame arguments and give evidence for their ideas with everyday language (e.g., Berland et al, 2016;Christodoulou & Osborne, 2014) that allows them to authentically practice engineering (Jung & McFadden, 2018). In fact, young students' scientific understandings are often underestimated and misunderstood if assessment is based primarily on their language use (Bleicher, Tobin, & McRobbie, 2003;Blown & Bryce, 2016). The language of engineering can be improved as students develop more complex disciplinary knowledge.…”
Section: Teacher Talkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual therefore may switch between features and alter his/her contemplations mid-response. In Blown and Bryce (2017), we cite examples of children switching between everyday and scientific language during the course of interviews, thereby exposing a mixture of conceptual attributes, some of which may be in conflict (and possibly lead to confusions in the categories into which an observer might classify children's thinking). In the next section, we shall say more about 'switching'.…”
Section: Feedback and Re-entry Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging the differences in how interviewees respond during in-depth, multi-modal investigations; the not insignificant extent of mode switching (see Blown 2016 andBryce 2017); and the challenge posed by the considerations concerning mental construction and representation set out earlier, we scrutinised a wide range of interview protocols for evidence as to:…”
Section: Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…& the cultural factors permeating the acquisition and development of children's concepts (Bryce and Blown 2006); & the changes which occur as knowledge is restructured (Blown and Bryce 2006); & the similarities and differences in the gender effects apparent in comparative studies (Bryce and Blown 2007); & the conceptual coherence detectable in children's developing ideas (Blown and Bryce 2010); & the relative gains, overlaps and deficits in expertise across the novice-expert continuum (Bryce and Blown 2012); & thought-experiments about gravity in the history of science and in research into children's thinking (Blown and Bryce 2012); & the confusions detectable in young people's ideas about the shape and size of ESM (Bryce and Blown 2013); & the relationships between what is revealed as children manipulate their own play-dough models of the ESM and their apparent conceptualisations of these astronomical bodies (Bryce and Blown 2016); & the switching between everyday and scientific language evident in what they articulate during interviews (Blown and Bryce 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is analogous to everyday thought and language as used by children and adults in their daily lives "within the supportive context of meaningful events". The latter is synonymous with scientific (formal or abstract) language as used by scientifically literate adults, which moves "beyond the bounds of human sense" and may do so "in a way that leaves out content and meaning entirely" (pp.76-77) (see Blown and Bryce 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%