2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switchgrass Genomic Diversity, Ploidy, and Evolution: Novel Insights from a Network-Based SNP Discovery Protocol

Abstract: Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a perennial grass that has been designated as an herbaceous model biofuel crop for the United States of America. To facilitate accelerated breeding programs of switchgrass, we developed both an association panel and linkage populations for genome-wide association study (GWAS) and genomic selection (GS). All of the 840 individuals were then genotyped using genotyping by sequencing (GBS), generating 350 GB of sequence in total. As a highly heterozygous polyploid (tetraploid a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
652
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 590 publications
(684 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
18
652
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For each sequenced library, the number of raw reads and filtered data are provided in Table S1. SNP calling per pool was performed using the Tassel 3.0 Universal Network‐Enabled Analysis Kit (UNEAK; Lu et al., 2013). We refiltered the individual raw sequences with Stacks software (Catchen, Amores, Hohenlohe, Cresko, & Postlethwait, 2011), which confirmed the low coverage and high rate of missing data for individual genotype calling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each sequenced library, the number of raw reads and filtered data are provided in Table S1. SNP calling per pool was performed using the Tassel 3.0 Universal Network‐Enabled Analysis Kit (UNEAK; Lu et al., 2013). We refiltered the individual raw sequences with Stacks software (Catchen, Amores, Hohenlohe, Cresko, & Postlethwait, 2011), which confirmed the low coverage and high rate of missing data for individual genotype calling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pipeline enables variant locus identification and genotyping of GBS data lacking a reference genome via (1) reciprocal mapping of Illumina sequences for de novo discovery of likely allele pairs at the same loci, (2) employing network analysis and filtration (Lu et al. 2013), and ultimately (3) using a binomial likelihood ratio method (Glaubitz et al. 2014) for quantitative genotype calling at polymorphic sites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GBS in particular has proven to be very adequate for these tasks (Poland et al 2012;Saintenac et al 2013;Lu et al 2013). Here we constructed GBS libraries and employed QTL analyses in an F6 RIL population to map known and novel genomic regions associated to resistance to two aphid species in wheat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We processed the GBS reads for SNP calling with the Universal Network Enabled Analysis Kit (UNEAK) implemented in TASSEL 3.0 standalone version (Lu et al 2013). The GBS raw data from the Illumina HiSeq2000 machine were first trimmed to a length of 64 bp to keep high quality sequences, then identical reads were grouped into tags; further these tags were pairwise aligned to identify single base pair mismatches, which represented candidate SNPs.…”
Section: Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%