2014
DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2014.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switch of the mutation type of the NPM1 gene in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): relapse or secondary AML?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that we could identify and monitor rare NPM1 mutations using this technique validates our approach. There have been reports of switch of NPM1 mutations at relapse [16]. Although, we did not find any evidence of switch in the NPM1 mutation type either at post induction or post consolidation time points, an NGS based approach provides a definitive advantage over mutation specific testing in potentially detecting a NPM1 clonal switch.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that we could identify and monitor rare NPM1 mutations using this technique validates our approach. There have been reports of switch of NPM1 mutations at relapse [16]. Although, we did not find any evidence of switch in the NPM1 mutation type either at post induction or post consolidation time points, an NGS based approach provides a definitive advantage over mutation specific testing in potentially detecting a NPM1 clonal switch.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Diagnostic DNA was available in 81 patients. These samples were sequenced to characterize the mutation, ensure the stability of NPM1 mutation over post-induction (PI) and first post consolidation (PC) time points and ascertain whether there was any switch in the mutation type in the course of treatment [16]. We did not detect a clonal switch in our cohort.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is underlined by the identification of pre-leukemic clones of second AML that lack the primary AML pre-leukemic DNMT3A , TET2 , SRSF2 or RUNX1 mutations. 40,70 Nevertheless, most of these second-AML-initiating clones share the same early, pre-leukemic mutations as the primary AML clone, 40,65 and some even evolve similarly to the primary clone and acquire a different mutation in the same gene, 70,71 emphasizing the role of an environmental selective pressure (Figure 2).…”
Section: Clinical Implications and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we found that the universal and mutantspecific multiplex primer sets resulted in 0.093% positive partitions, indicating that counting was accurate irrespective of subtype (odds ratio, 1.002; 95% CI, 0.956e1.049; P Z 0.934) ( Figure 3B). Given the reported instances of clonal heterogeneity 23 and type switching 24 in selected AML cases and success with the multiplex target pool in Figure 3B, we next sought to determine the ability of the massively multiplex assay to quantify NPM1muts in the setting of clonal heterogeneity ( Figure 3C). To this end, plasmids harboring type A and/or type B NPM1muts were spiked into NPM1 wild-type GM12878 cDNA alone or combined as a 50:50 mixture of type A and type B (A:B) to target a total of approximately 350 NPM1mut/10 4 ABL1 copies in all cases.…”
Section: Other Rare Npm1mut Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a substantial number of patients with NPM1mut AML would be ineligible for MRD assessment because they lack NPM1 sequence information and/or the availability of an appropriate test. Finally, although NPM1muts are generally stable over time, 20e22 there have been reports of intrapatient heterogeneity 23 and type switching, 24 both of which could result in false-negative determinations of MRD status in individual cases. Next-generation sequencingebased approaches can circumvent these challenges because they do not require prior sequence information for detection of NPM1muts in the context of MRD and have sensitivities that exceed flow cytometry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%