2016
DOI: 10.1080/00207217.2016.1138243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switch failure diagnosis based on inductor current observation for boost converters

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In OCF, after the fault detection the faulty switch can be restored with a redundant switch, whereas in SCF the reconfiguration of the converter will happen only after the faulty switch is disconnected [40]. A comparison between the delayed version of gating signals and the sign of the inductor current slope is used as fault diagnostic to identify both OCF and SCF in non-isolated DC-DC boost converter [41]. However, still the same approach can be applied to any other non-isolated single switch DC-DC converters including buck, buck-boost, Cuk, SEPIC and dual SEPIC converters.…”
Section: Signal Processing Algorithms Based On Time Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In OCF, after the fault detection the faulty switch can be restored with a redundant switch, whereas in SCF the reconfiguration of the converter will happen only after the faulty switch is disconnected [40]. A comparison between the delayed version of gating signals and the sign of the inductor current slope is used as fault diagnostic to identify both OCF and SCF in non-isolated DC-DC boost converter [41]. However, still the same approach can be applied to any other non-isolated single switch DC-DC converters including buck, buck-boost, Cuk, SEPIC and dual SEPIC converters.…”
Section: Signal Processing Algorithms Based On Time Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between the delayed version of gating signals and the sign of the inductor current slope is used as fault diagnostic to identify both OCF and SCF in non‐isolated DC–DC boost converter [41]. However, still the same approach can be applied to any other non‐isolated single switch DC–DC converters including buck, buck–boost, Cuk, SEPIC and dual SEPIC converters.…”
Section: Fault Diagnostic Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To slightly improve the diagnostic effectiveness, the non-ideal response of the converter is considered in the implementation of another derivation of the original algorithm. The fault diagnostic action compares the sign of the inductor current slope and a delayed version of the gating signal, characteristic of the non-ideal converter [9] . Supported on the same diagnostic principles, simpler strategies, requiring less computational effort, were developed.…”
Section: Time Domain Signal Processing Based Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review presented for fault identification and switches tolerant control of fault at high voltage the system of DC 3 . Fault identification for switches has been analyzed in many papers 3‐7 . More parameters are to be sensed to identify faults and increases the system cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Fault identification for switches has been analyzed in many papers. [3][4][5][6][7] More parameters are to be sensed to identify faults and increases the system cost. The detailed switching action of the diode is not discussed in the design of the systems on fault-tolerant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%