2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2013
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2013.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swiss Executive Authorities on Open Government Data -- Policy Making beyond Transparency and Participation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Peters & Britez, 2008), which sees citizens as coproducers of public policies and demands public access to official information. The availability of OGD is for example believed to increase government transparency and trust (Bertot et al, 2010) as well as citizen participation and collaboration (Neuroni et al, 2013). Secondly, the OGD movement is also related to the idea of data as a tremendous resource that yet is largely untapped (Dietrich et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peters & Britez, 2008), which sees citizens as coproducers of public policies and demands public access to official information. The availability of OGD is for example believed to increase government transparency and trust (Bertot et al, 2010) as well as citizen participation and collaboration (Neuroni et al, 2013). Secondly, the OGD movement is also related to the idea of data as a tremendous resource that yet is largely untapped (Dietrich et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discuss each stream of conditions and factors below. Altayar 2018, Barry and Bannister (2014), Conradie and Choenni (2014), Janssen et al (2012), Neuroni et al (2013), Wirtz et al (2016), Yang et al (2015) Means for communicating data users' feedback on the opened data and OGD provider's follow-ups on users' feedback Janssen et al (2012), Máchová et al (2018), Susha et al (2015), Zuiderwijk et al (2012)…”
Section: Findings From the Systematic Literature Review: Conditions Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former stresses the potential for innovation that may result from opening government data and letting citizens and entrepreneurs reuse this data to develop innovative services, such as Mapnificent or Weyeser's data transparency mash-up. The idea is that the reuse of existing data (e.g., statistical data, geo-data, traffic data) creates new value [12]. The reasoning behind administrative efficiency holds that data sharing and collaboration between public agencies make the production and distribution of public services more efficient, enhance their quality and expose administrative inefficiencies and fraud [13].…”
Section: 2 Open Government Datamentioning
confidence: 99%