2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swirling flow in a hydraulic turbine discharge cone at different speeds and discharge conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When shifting the operation conditions of the hydro turbine apart from the nominal regime, the flow passing the impeller acquires a swirl. The swirling level of the flow is commonly represented by the swirl parameter S determined in turn as the ratio of the axial flux of the angular momentum M to the product of the axial flux of the axial momentum G and the characteristic radius R [12]: The momenta M and G in equation ( 1) can be calculated based on the measured velocity distributions (V is the axial component and U is the tangential component; 𝐷 0 is the channel diameter in the measured cross-section):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When shifting the operation conditions of the hydro turbine apart from the nominal regime, the flow passing the impeller acquires a swirl. The swirling level of the flow is commonly represented by the swirl parameter S determined in turn as the ratio of the axial flux of the angular momentum M to the product of the axial flux of the axial momentum G and the characteristic radius R [12]: The momenta M and G in equation ( 1) can be calculated based on the measured velocity distributions (V is the axial component and U is the tangential component; 𝐷 0 is the channel diameter in the measured cross-section):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first case, the flow swirl number exceeds the critical value of 0.5 at which the vortex breakdown normally takes place [8]. This means the development of a central recirculation zone, shifting the flow towards the cone wall, and the emergence of unsteady large-scale vortical structures in the form of precessing vortex core (PVC) [12]. In the second case, the swirl number remains below the threshold level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To model the conditions for PVC formation, we did not simulate the entire hydroturbine channel, including the spiral case, the guide vanes and the runner, but we used a simplified geometry consisting of two swirlers, one stationary and one rotating, arranged in series. This makes it possible to simulate the velocity distribution at the inlet of the draft tube model that coincides with the velocity distribution at the inlet of the full-scale turbine draft tube [24][25][26]. The blades were designed so as to provide optimum performance of Francis hydraulic turbines [27] (Best Efficiency Point, BEP), which for the scale of the given test section, corresponds to a volumetric flow rate Q c = 0.049 m 3 /s and a speed of the clockwise rotating runner n c = 2432 rpm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benchmark problem called "Timisoara Swirl Generator" which includes the computational domains with mesh and experimental data are available as OpenFOAM test case [67]. This benchmark problem has been used by other groups [65,68] to investigate the behavior of the swirling flow similar to Francis turbine.…”
Section: Experimental Setup 21 Test Rig Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%