2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13408-1_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swing Trajectory Control for Large Excavators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the nominal swing system dynamics represented by (15) has stable zeros, the system is minimum phase and the internal dynamics is stable.…”
Section: Dynamic Model Of the Swing Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the nominal swing system dynamics represented by (15) has stable zeros, the system is minimum phase and the internal dynamics is stable.…”
Section: Dynamic Model Of the Swing Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional hydraulic excavators have fewer vibration problems during swing operation because the hydraulic swing motor has a large damping capacity and suppresses the vibration. Several studies have been conducted to improve the performance of the swing control of the conventional hydraulic excavator [13][14][15]. Electric motors can develop severe negative damping during the transient state due to the electromagnetic characteristics between the rotor and the stator [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1996, Sepehri studied the gear backlash and stick-slip friction in hydraulic swing motion [10]. Some other researchers presented several closed-loop control algorithms to improve the swing motion performance [11][12][13][14]. However, in practical applications, open-loop control algorithm is more applicable than closed-loop control algorithm due to several difficulties, e.g., time-varying swing inertia, unknown payload and parametric uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An independent system is proposed to verify that pose estimates are sufficiently accurate for the safe operation of autonomous sub-systems such as swing trajectory control [1] and collision avoidance [2]. The pose verification problem in this context is defined as the task of using independent measurements to determine if a given pose estimate is within an acceptable tolerance of the actual pose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%