Diseases of Swine 2019
DOI: 10.1002/9781119350927.ch62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swine Dysentery and Brachyspiral Colitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 182 publications
1
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Swine dysentery (SD) is an economically significant disease of growing pigs characterized by mucohemorragic diarrhea, or watery feces containing large amounts of mucus and flecks of blood (1). Pigs clinically affected with SD become anorexic and dehydrated, resulting in rapid weight loss (2). The causative agents of SD include strongly hemolytic Brachyspira spp., such as Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Brachyspira hampsonii (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Swine dysentery (SD) is an economically significant disease of growing pigs characterized by mucohemorragic diarrhea, or watery feces containing large amounts of mucus and flecks of blood (1). Pigs clinically affected with SD become anorexic and dehydrated, resulting in rapid weight loss (2). The causative agents of SD include strongly hemolytic Brachyspira spp., such as Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Brachyspira hampsonii (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pigs clinically affected with SD become anorexic and dehydrated, resulting in rapid weight loss (2). The causative agents of SD include strongly hemolytic Brachyspira spp., such as Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Brachyspira hampsonii (2). Upon association with the colonic epithelium, B. hyodysenteriae causes marked inflammation, hemorrhage, superficial epithelial necrosis, and excessive production of mucus (3,4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eradication programmes that were used can be classified into three major groups, namely total depopulation of animals on the farm, partial depopulation, and antimicrobial medication without depopulation. Most of the programmes were initiated in spring or summer, as environmental survival of B. hyodysenteriae is diminished during the warm season [30]. Every strategy was Table 4 Results of susceptibility testing and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (PubMLST) of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae isolates obtained before and after the eradication program on the 10 farms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that no depopulation was practiced was a major weakness as it hampered the implementation of proper cleaning, disinfection and stand-empty periods. The two farms practiced all-in/all-out at room level, but the stand-empty period between successive batches was short (3 days), leaving insufficient time for thorough drying of the environment [30]. Also the rodent control was insufficient on both farms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation