2002
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/24.12.1335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swimming behaviour of Daphnia clones: differentiation through predator infochemicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2a, 3a) for all species. This is consistent with the zooplankton prey being aware of the predator through their sensing infochemicals present in water (Weber and Van Noordwijk 2002;Pangle et al 2007). Mean speed of D. mendotae and D. pulicaria was faster in the presence of Bythotrephes, while D. retrocurva and diaptomids were slower (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…2a, 3a) for all species. This is consistent with the zooplankton prey being aware of the predator through their sensing infochemicals present in water (Weber and Van Noordwijk 2002;Pangle et al 2007). Mean speed of D. mendotae and D. pulicaria was faster in the presence of Bythotrephes, while D. retrocurva and diaptomids were slower (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The reduction of body size (Engelmayer, 1995;De Meester & Weider, 1999;Sakwinska, 2000;Weber, 2003;Sakwinska & Dawidowicz, 2005) is also frequently observed in Daphnia exposed to fish chemical cues or kairomones. Antipredator behavioural responses allow daphnids to react to predator presence within a short period of time (De Meester & Cousyn, 1997;Lass & Spaak, 2003) and include avoidance or escape abilities (Pijanowska & Kowalczewski, 1997;Roozen & Lürling, 2001), changes in phototactic behaviour (De Meester & Cousyn, 1997;Van Gool & Ringelberg, 2002;Michels & De Meester, 2004), depth selection (Dodson, 1988;De Meester & Cousyn, 1997;Weber & van Noordwijk, 2002), changes in swimming speed (Pijanowska & Kowalczewski, 1997;Weber & van Noordwijk, 2002), and aggregation or swarming formation (Pijanowska & Kowalczewski, 1997;Roozen & Lürling, 2001). Ultimately, these simple predator-induced behaviours constitute the basis of more complex migratory phenomena, such as diel vertical (DVM) or diel horizontal (DHM) migration (Lass & Spaak, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the cladoceran individuals have to expend more energy and time to obtain the same swimming distance (i.e., having lower swimming ability) in tall cuboid chambers than short ones, even when the chambers have the same volume and shape. Because the grazing rate of cladoceran individuals is generally positively dependent on their swimming ability (Weber & Van Noordwijk 2002;Christensen et al 2005;Visser & Kiørboe 2006), we further hypothesize that the grazing rate of cladoceran species is lower in tall chambers than short ones, for a given chamber volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Altering the swimming velocity of aquatic grazers might affect the grazing rate of the organism (Weber & Van Noordwijk 2002;Christensen et al 2005;Visser & Kiørboe 2006), since it affects the encounter rate between the predator and its prey, assuming the encounter rate is a function of prey density and the mean velocity of both predator and prey (Gerritsen 1980). Usually, more active grazers are more likely to encounter prey and thus may have a higher grazing rate.…”
Section: Quiescent Status (S)mentioning
confidence: 99%