2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swift residue‐screening identifies key N‐glycosylated asparagines sufficient for surface expression of neuroglycoprotein Lingo‐1

Abstract: a b s t r a c tAdvances in genomics and proteomics have generated the needs for the efficient identification of key residues for structure and function of target proteins. Here we report the utilization of a new residue-screening approach, which combines a mammalian high-throughput transient expression system with a PCR-based expression cassette, for the study of the post-translational modification. Applying this approach results in a quick identification of essential N-glycosylation sites of a heavily glycosy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we used an anti‐LINGO‐1 antibody, and its specificity was first evaluated by Western blotting on HEK‐293 cell lysates overexpressing LINGO‐1‐HA and compared with the results obtained with the anti‐HA antibody. Both antibodies labelled two prominent immunoreactive species at approximatively 80 and 100 kDa (Figure A), corresponding to different states of LINGO‐1 glycosylation (Zhong et al ., ; Supporting Information http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.12945/suppinfo) and thereby demonstrating the specificity of the anti‐LINGO‐1 antibody used here. Following chemical cross‐linking, cell lysates were subjected to SDS/PAGE under reducing conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For this purpose, we used an anti‐LINGO‐1 antibody, and its specificity was first evaluated by Western blotting on HEK‐293 cell lysates overexpressing LINGO‐1‐HA and compared with the results obtained with the anti‐HA antibody. Both antibodies labelled two prominent immunoreactive species at approximatively 80 and 100 kDa (Figure A), corresponding to different states of LINGO‐1 glycosylation (Zhong et al ., ; Supporting Information http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.12945/suppinfo) and thereby demonstrating the specificity of the anti‐LINGO‐1 antibody used here. Following chemical cross‐linking, cell lysates were subjected to SDS/PAGE under reducing conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Indeed, galectin‐4 has also been demonstrated to bind to N‐glycans on human colon cancer cells (Ideo et al, 2005; Morelle et al, 2009; Wu et al, 2004). Interestingly, LINGO‐1 and Notch are N‐glycosylated OLG cell surface receptors that have been shown to negatively regulate OLG maturation (Mi etal., 2005; Wang et al, 1998; Zhong et al, 2009). Accordingly, galectin‐4 might be a potential agonist for these receptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, methods used for production and purification of secreted recombinant proteins could affect their biological activity, including their ability to interact with other proteins because of differences in posttranslational modifications introduced by artificial cell expression systems (23). In fact, LINGO-1 contains several N-glycosylation sites that could negatively and unpredictably affect its capacity for self-interaction either in cis or in trans (24,25), for interaction with its other partners, or with gangliosides that modulate those interactions (23,26,27). Instead, the use of gene expression vectors or transgenic animals to drive expression in primary cells would be expected to be less prone to this kind of modification in biological activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%