2015
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a4248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Cerebral microbleeds are thought to have potentially important clinical implications in dementia and stroke. However, the use of both T2* and SWI MR imaging sequences for microbleed detection has complicated the crosscomparison of study results. We aimed to determine the impact of microbleed sequences on microbleed detection and associated clinical parameters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study used an SWI sequence obtained at 3T, while previous reports in controls used 1.5T machines and/or T2* sequences. It has been shown that SWI sequences detect more CMBs than 2D gradient-recalled echo sequences, [30][31][32] with an increase in detected lesions of 67% according to Nandigam et al 30 As in our study, the prevalence of CMBs was relatively similar in patients with MCI and controls (14% and 11%, respectively) in the cohort of Ayaz et al, 33 including 28 healthy controls and 75 subjects with MCI examined at 1.5T with a SWI sequence. Other studies found an association between CMBs and low cognitive performance 12 or cognitive decline.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Cmbssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The present study used an SWI sequence obtained at 3T, while previous reports in controls used 1.5T machines and/or T2* sequences. It has been shown that SWI sequences detect more CMBs than 2D gradient-recalled echo sequences, [30][31][32] with an increase in detected lesions of 67% according to Nandigam et al 30 As in our study, the prevalence of CMBs was relatively similar in patients with MCI and controls (14% and 11%, respectively) in the cohort of Ayaz et al, 33 including 28 healthy controls and 75 subjects with MCI examined at 1.5T with a SWI sequence. Other studies found an association between CMBs and low cognitive performance 12 or cognitive decline.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Cmbssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…14,22,23 Higher field strengths are associated with higher detection rates, whereas susceptibility weighted imaging promises superiority over T2*-weighted imaging. 22,23 The first description of cMBs in Asian patients with MMD revealed a detection rate of 44% of patients at 3 Tesla with T2* sequence versus 28% at 1.5 Tesla.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementary Table 2 shows the distribution over diagnostic groups on the 3.0T scanner and SWI sequence which are most sensitive to CMBs. 16 …”
Section: Mri Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%