2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2013.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swelling characteristics of GMZ bentonite and its mixtures with sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different types of bentonites with different fractions of montmorillonite (the mineral that provides the advantageous properties sought in bentonites), depending on their location and/or geological origin. The most commonly studied for the deep geological disposal of radiactive waste are: (i) the MX-80 bentonite, considered as reference material for engineered barriers in countries such as Sweden (Jönsson et al 2009) and Finland (Kumpulainen and Kiviranta 2010), (ii) the FEBEX bentonite, which is the reference material in Spain (Huertas et al 2006) and, (iii) the GMZ bentonite, studied in China, the world's largest producer of spent nuclear fuel (Sun et al 2013). Other clayey materials such as Opalinus Clay (Appelo and Wersin 2007;Mäder 2004) from Mont Terri (Switzerland), the Callovo-Oxfordian Clay (Gaucher et al 2004) from Meuse/Haute-Marne Underground Research Laboratory (URL) located at Bure (France) and the Boom Clay (Maes et al 2002;Romero et al 1999) of Mol (Belgium) are also being currently studied as potential parameterisation and then validated by comparing the results with those obtained in experimental tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different types of bentonites with different fractions of montmorillonite (the mineral that provides the advantageous properties sought in bentonites), depending on their location and/or geological origin. The most commonly studied for the deep geological disposal of radiactive waste are: (i) the MX-80 bentonite, considered as reference material for engineered barriers in countries such as Sweden (Jönsson et al 2009) and Finland (Kumpulainen and Kiviranta 2010), (ii) the FEBEX bentonite, which is the reference material in Spain (Huertas et al 2006) and, (iii) the GMZ bentonite, studied in China, the world's largest producer of spent nuclear fuel (Sun et al 2013). Other clayey materials such as Opalinus Clay (Appelo and Wersin 2007;Mäder 2004) from Mont Terri (Switzerland), the Callovo-Oxfordian Clay (Gaucher et al 2004) from Meuse/Haute-Marne Underground Research Laboratory (URL) located at Bure (France) and the Boom Clay (Maes et al 2002;Romero et al 1999) of Mol (Belgium) are also being currently studied as potential parameterisation and then validated by comparing the results with those obtained in experimental tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the sand content is higher than the critical sand content, the swelling of mixtures expressed in terms of clay/montmorillonite void ratio deviates from the bentonite behaviour above a stress, which has been observed and identified by many researchers Sun et al, 2009Sun et al, , 2013. In Sun et al, 2015, the authors normalized the swelling with the montmorillonite void ratio and proposed a predictive method to determine the e m -σ v relationship for mixtures with more sand than critical sand content α N α s .…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, it was not the case for low bentonite fractions. Indeed, Sun et al [23,24] carried out swelling deformation and collapse tests on Kunigel-V1 bentonite/sand (an initial dry density of 0.86-1.51 Mg/m 3 ) and GMZ bentonite/sand (an initial dry density of 1.59-1.73 Mg/m 3 ) mixtures with bentonite fractions of 10, 17, 20 and 30%. They found that the bentonite/sand mixtures collapsed upon hydration under a large vertical stress and formed a sand skeleton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%