1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(97)00031-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swelling and dissolution of the macromolecular structure of bituminous coals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all of the cases the transport mechanism of pyridine might be considered as anomalous (non-Fickian) transport. The n values measured in the present work are very close to Fickian transport mechanism boundaries since the non-Fickian diffusion coefficients in the literature usually are in the range of 0.6−1.0, ,,, therefore it will not be erroneous to claim that the diffusion of pyridine in a low rank coal like Elbistan lignite (53.0% C) was with a process somewhere between Fickian and relaxation controlled as discussed by Ritger and Peppas …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In all of the cases the transport mechanism of pyridine might be considered as anomalous (non-Fickian) transport. The n values measured in the present work are very close to Fickian transport mechanism boundaries since the non-Fickian diffusion coefficients in the literature usually are in the range of 0.6−1.0, ,,, therefore it will not be erroneous to claim that the diffusion of pyridine in a low rank coal like Elbistan lignite (53.0% C) was with a process somewhere between Fickian and relaxation controlled as discussed by Ritger and Peppas …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The diffusion exponents, n , were calculated to be between 0.58 and 1.00 in all of the experiments done at all temperatures, indicating an anomalous diffusion mechanism. The anomalous coefficients of diffusion in the literature usually are in the range of 0.6−1.0. , Although the literature is similar to our results, it is clear that those different techniques, models, and assumptions (crystal shape and size) may strongly affect the results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The tendency of the changes in tgd parameter in the graphs suggests that both additives cause a decrease in the maximum of dielectric losses corresponding to the dielectric glass-rubber transition and shift this maximum towards lower temperatures in comparison to the data for coals pyrolyzed without additives. This points to the plasticizing effect of the two additives on organic material of the investigated coals during carbonization [21,26]. Since plasticized coals have a greater conformation mobility of fragments of macromolecules, the change in their orientation will be facilitated in an alternating electric field.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 87%