2015
DOI: 10.7582/gge.2015.18.4.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swell Effect Correction of Sub-bottom Profiler Data with Weak Sea Bottom Signal

Abstract: A 3.5 kHz or chirp sub-bottom profiling survey is widely used in the marine geological and engineering purpose exploration. However, swells in the sea degrade the quality of the survey data. The horizontal continuity of profiler data can be enhanced and the quality can be improved by correcting the influence of the swell. Accurate detection of sea bottom location is important in correcting the swell effect. In this study, we tried to pick sea bottom locations by finding the position of crossing a threshold of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Swell effect corrections are divided into two steps, consisting of sea-bottom detection and subsequent swell suppression. In order to effectively remove the swell, accurate sea-bottom detection on the seismic dataset is important (Lee et al, 2015). One method of sea-bottom detection is based on the cross-correlation scheme, which recognizes the sea-bottom at the point of maximum crosscorrelation between the seismic source signal and the reflected signal trace (Kim et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swell effect corrections are divided into two steps, consisting of sea-bottom detection and subsequent swell suppression. In order to effectively remove the swell, accurate sea-bottom detection on the seismic dataset is important (Lee et al, 2015). One method of sea-bottom detection is based on the cross-correlation scheme, which recognizes the sea-bottom at the point of maximum crosscorrelation between the seismic source signal and the reflected signal trace (Kim et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%