2022
DOI: 10.1111/ner.13356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sweetspot Mapping in Deep Brain Stimulation: Strengths and Limitations of Current Approaches

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistically, a t test model comparing to zero has been criticized, in the past, because most patients improve and, therefore, t-values will always be positive. 47 However, because we used the t-values only as a surrogate parameter for our maps and not as an indicator of voxel-wise statistical significance, this problem is only of little importance.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistically, a t test model comparing to zero has been criticized, in the past, because most patients improve and, therefore, t-values will always be positive. 47 However, because we used the t-values only as a surrogate parameter for our maps and not as an indicator of voxel-wise statistical significance, this problem is only of little importance.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some questions remain regarding the optimal DBS target for dystonia in the pallidal region. 24 Previously published approaches result in a variety of different DBS “hotspots” when used in the same dataset. The most recent models, which employed voxel‐wise statistics comparing the outcomes of each voxel against an average of other outcomes in the dataset, explained substantially greater response variance compared to classically‐described target locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent models, which employed voxel‐wise statistics comparing the outcomes of each voxel against an average of other outcomes in the dataset, explained substantially greater response variance compared to classically‐described target locations. 11 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 These voxel‐wise models provide the highest accuracy and predictive capabilities between detected and predefined outcome maps. Furthermore, these models explain large amounts of variance during the out‐of‐sample prediction analysis, highlighting their potential use to refine DBS delivery and in future applications like computer‐guided DBS programming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an exploratory analysis, we aimed to map the effects of DBS on tic severity to the volumes of activated tissue (VAT) by the DBS electrodes to illustrate the distribution of the main outcome across the stimulated brain tissue. We performed this analysis following previous approaches to identify optimal DBS "sweet spots" [8,9], a detailed description is given in the supplement. In brief, we reconstructed electrodes and VATs based on individual stimulation parameters in standard space using the Lead-DBS toolbox [10].…”
Section: Mapping Effects Of Dbs To Stimulated Brain Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%