2017
DOI: 10.1017/s2040470017001236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sweet pepper maturity evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best total harvesting efficiency was obtained at a speed of 400 rpm. However, operating the equipment at this speed resulted in overall equipment vibration [17].…”
Section: Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best total harvesting efficiency was obtained at a speed of 400 rpm. However, operating the equipment at this speed resulted in overall equipment vibration [17].…”
Section: Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These heterogeneous ripening patterns hinder the possibility to determine maturity accurately from a single viewpoint since the information from this single sideview might be misleading. Although a single bottom-view can be used to differentiate between mature and immature peppers [29,30], a viewpoint directly below the pepper (facing upwards) is most likely not applicable for robotic harvesting because this viewpoint is often occluded by leaves [31]. Furthermore, it is not efficient since it requires the robot to move the camera from the bottom of the pepper all the way up to the peduncle to harvest the pepper when it is mature.…”
Section: Maturity Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 69 red and 70 yellow sweet peppers were harvested in a commercial greenhouse in Kmehin, Israel, on 18 November 2019. The peppers were manually classified into maturity classes 2-4 (Table 1, Figure 2), which are defined in Harel et al [30], by manually observing all sides of the pepper. Peppers belonging to class 2 (50-95% green) are considered as immature and peppers belonging to classes 3 (50-95% colored) and 4 (more than 95% colored) are considered mature.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms rely mainly on previous work in indoor conditions where detailed 3D plant models can be extracted using hand‐held 3D scanners (Schunck et al, 2021), acquiring data from multiple viewpoints. Despite previous work showing that employing multiple viewpoints can significantly improve precision (i.e., Harel et al, 2016; Kurtser & Edan, 2018b), most outdoor algorithms rely on pointclouds acquired from a single location. This can be attributed to a working assumption often voiced in the field that state‐of‐the‐art registration algorithms generally fail to provide accurate registration results for the noisy outdoor sensory data acquired from RGB‐D cameras and the dense and repetitive soft dynamic foliage present in the agricultural domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%