1998
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1998.468.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sweet Cherry Rootstock/Virus Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wild‐type ‘Gisela 7’ was initially identified as a valuable rootstock for commercial release, but this action was rescinded when its sensitivity to PNRSV became apparent. Similar to the previous report (Lang et al ., ), in this study nontransgenic ‘Gisela 7’ is susceptible to both PNRSV (Fulton G) and a combined PNRSV/PDV (CH39). After transformation with the RNAi vector pART27–PNRSV, transgenic ‘Gisela 7’ showed high resistance to PNRSV (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Wild‐type ‘Gisela 7’ was initially identified as a valuable rootstock for commercial release, but this action was rescinded when its sensitivity to PNRSV became apparent. Similar to the previous report (Lang et al ., ), in this study nontransgenic ‘Gisela 7’ is susceptible to both PNRSV (Fulton G) and a combined PNRSV/PDV (CH39). After transformation with the RNAi vector pART27–PNRSV, transgenic ‘Gisela 7’ showed high resistance to PNRSV (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…‘Gisela 6’ is one of the most important new cherry rootstocks released in the past 20 years, due to its promotion of early and high productivity in commercial scion varieties. It has been characterized as being tolerant of infection by both PNRSV and Prune dwarf virus (PDV) (Lang et al ., ). When we inoculated standard ‘Gisela 6’ plants with a combined source of PNRSV/PDV (CH39), our results were consistent with previous reports.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(steppe or ground cherry) are known to exhibit varying levels of sensitivity to these viruses, and hence so do some of the new rootstocks that have been selected or hybridized from these species. Lang et al (1997Lang et al ( , 1998 have shown that the virus can pass from the point of infection (young flowering shoots) to the graft union within 10 weeks, whereupon a hypersensitive rootstock may begin exuding gum, followed by yellowing and pre-mature abscission of leaves. During the second growing season following infection, hypersensitive trees collapse and die.…”
Section: Screening For Virus Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little research has been conducted on the disease susceptibilities of these new rootstocks in North America, with the exception of bacterial canker (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae van Hall) (Krzesinska and Azarenko, 1992), Phytophthora (see below) and Armillaria (see below) root rots (Cummins et al, 1986;Proffer et al, 1988), and the ilarvirus sensitivity described above (Lang et al, 1997(Lang et al, , 1998. While the severity and longevity of bacterial canker infections vary with climate and can sometimes be managed, selection of rootstocks that are less susceptible is a high priority in certain areas like Oregon's Willamette valley.…”
Section: Other Disease Sensitivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%