Abstract:We show that if two 3-manifolds with toroidal boundary are glued via a "sufficiently complicated" map then every Heegaard splitting of the resulting 3-manifold is weakly reducible. Additionally, suppose X ∪ F Y is a manifold obtained by gluing X and Y , two connected small manifolds with incompressible boundary, along a closed surface F . Then the following inequality on genera is obtained:Both results follow from a new technique to simplify the intersection between an incompressible surface and a strongly irr… Show more
“…It is, perhaps, well-known. It appears in similar versions as Lemma 5.2 in [1] and as a remark following Definition 2.1 in [13]. Proof Let y U [ y S y V be the absolute Heegaard splitting for N obtained by including Á.V \ B/ into U for each component B @N which intersects S .…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Y between complexes is proper if the preimage of each compact set is compact. If X is a surface and Y is 3-manifold, is a proper embedding if, in addition to being proper and an embedding, 1 . @Y / D @X .…”
Section: -Manifold Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y is proper if it is proper as a map. If X is a surface and Y is a 3-manifold we also require that 1 . @Y / D @.X I /.…”
Section: -Manifold Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark There are many other similar constructions of 3-manifolds with infinitely generated fundamental group which have non-stabilized splittings. By allowing arbitrary glueing maps between boundary tori of the compact pieces, one can use a theorem of Bachman, Schleimer, and Sedgewick [1] to show that the amalgamated splittings are not stabilized. We do not pursue this route further in this paper.…”
Section: Infinite Genus Splittings Which Are Not End-stabilizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only slides we performed were of the disc G over other discs, and since intersected G , G was not a disc of fr K nC1 [ fr K q . Furthermore, since the discs of 1 show up as spots on S 1 it is easy to arrange these slides to be relative to 1 . Thus, these handle-slides are of the sort allowed in sequences in L. Let l denote the sequence of these handle-slides followed by the slide-move (M2) where we add the disc D 0 to 1 .…”
A Heegaard splitting of an open 3-manifold is the partition of the manifold into two non-compact handlebodies which intersect on their common boundary. This paper proves several non-compact analogues of theorems about compact Heegaard splittings. The main result is a classification of Heegaard splittings of those open 3-manifolds obtained by removing boundary components (not all of which are 2-spheres) from a compact 3-manifold. Also studied is the relationship between exhaustions and Heegaard splittings of eventually end-irreducible 3-manifolds. It is shown that Heegaard splittings of end-irreducible 3-manifolds are formed by amalgamating Heegaard splittings of boundary-irreducible compact submanifolds.
57N10; 57M50
“…It is, perhaps, well-known. It appears in similar versions as Lemma 5.2 in [1] and as a remark following Definition 2.1 in [13]. Proof Let y U [ y S y V be the absolute Heegaard splitting for N obtained by including Á.V \ B/ into U for each component B @N which intersects S .…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Y between complexes is proper if the preimage of each compact set is compact. If X is a surface and Y is 3-manifold, is a proper embedding if, in addition to being proper and an embedding, 1 . @Y / D @X .…”
Section: -Manifold Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y is proper if it is proper as a map. If X is a surface and Y is a 3-manifold we also require that 1 . @Y / D @.X I /.…”
Section: -Manifold Topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark There are many other similar constructions of 3-manifolds with infinitely generated fundamental group which have non-stabilized splittings. By allowing arbitrary glueing maps between boundary tori of the compact pieces, one can use a theorem of Bachman, Schleimer, and Sedgewick [1] to show that the amalgamated splittings are not stabilized. We do not pursue this route further in this paper.…”
Section: Infinite Genus Splittings Which Are Not End-stabilizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only slides we performed were of the disc G over other discs, and since intersected G , G was not a disc of fr K nC1 [ fr K q . Furthermore, since the discs of 1 show up as spots on S 1 it is easy to arrange these slides to be relative to 1 . Thus, these handle-slides are of the sort allowed in sequences in L. Let l denote the sequence of these handle-slides followed by the slide-move (M2) where we add the disc D 0 to 1 .…”
A Heegaard splitting of an open 3-manifold is the partition of the manifold into two non-compact handlebodies which intersect on their common boundary. This paper proves several non-compact analogues of theorems about compact Heegaard splittings. The main result is a classification of Heegaard splittings of those open 3-manifolds obtained by removing boundary components (not all of which are 2-spheres) from a compact 3-manifold. Also studied is the relationship between exhaustions and Heegaard splittings of eventually end-irreducible 3-manifolds. It is shown that Heegaard splittings of end-irreducible 3-manifolds are formed by amalgamating Heegaard splittings of boundary-irreducible compact submanifolds.
57N10; 57M50
We show that Heegaard Genus ≤ g, the problem of deciding whether a triangulated 3-manifold admits a Heegaard splitting of genus less than or equal to g, is NP-hard. The result follows from a quadratic time reduction of the NP-complete problem CNF-SAT to Heegaard Genus ≤ g.
Pitzer College
Let M be a compact orientable manifold, and F be an essential closed surface which cuts M into two 3-manifolds M 1 and M 2 ., then M has a unique minimal Heegaard splitting up to isotopy, i.e. the amalgamation of V 1 ∪ S 1 W 1 and V 2 ∪ S 2 W 2 .
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.