“…Nevertheless, there are fifteen everyday-maker types of research, but each has a different motive. The various of everyday-maker's motives are; people's enthusiasm to collaborate with government and private sector (Sari, Sobari, & Marianti, 2020), women political participation (Rowe, 2015), celebrity politics (Marsh, Hart, & Tindall, 2010;Wheeler, 2012;Jensen, 2021), initiation to take care the economics crisis (Staiou & Gouscos in Manoharan & McQuiston (editor), 2018), migrants citizenship (Ostanel, 2012), mutual relationship between member activism and freelance activism (Frič & Vávra, 2016), do-it-ourself youth politics (Pickard, 2019), democratic disconnect in youth (Collin, 2014), citizenship norms in Facebook using by young people (Vromen et.al., 2016), dissapointment with the village government (Wafiq, 2018), social media politics to fight Trump extremism (Penney, 2019), active in social media (Özge & Bingöl, 2021), building identity of neighborhood to against Islamophobia (Elander, Fridolfsson, & Gustavsson, 2015), keeping norms in the neighborhood (Astriningtyas & Savirani, 2014), standard committee promotes local participation and good governance increasing (Lawton & Macaulay, 2014), youth understandings about politics (Vite, 2018;Kristensen in Kristensen et.al. (editor), 2022), youth identity developments (Upchurch in Arvanitakis & Matthews (editor), 2013), migrants culture (Mansouri & Mikola, 2014), sustainable environment development , pleasure to make a better environment (Van de Wijdeven & Hendriks in Duyvendak, Hendriks, & Van Niekerk (ed.…”