2013
DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2013.866628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swedish immersion in the early years in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to findings by Björklund, Mård-Miettinen, and Savijärvi (2014), Taylor (1992Taylor ( & 1998, Weber and Tardif (1990), routines became important parts of the French language learning environment in this study as well. The consistency of the routines created a sense of stability for the children, which was important to the effectiveness of the overall environment for learning French.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to findings by Björklund, Mård-Miettinen, and Savijärvi (2014), Taylor (1992Taylor ( & 1998, Weber and Tardif (1990), routines became important parts of the French language learning environment in this study as well. The consistency of the routines created a sense of stability for the children, which was important to the effectiveness of the overall environment for learning French.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…They suggest that routines provide a framework for new linguistic elements and can scaffold meaning for children with no prior knowledge of French; similarly, an absence of routines limits their L2 learning (Taylor, 1998). Björklund, Mård-Miettinen, and Savijärvi (2014) note that "routines are natural contexts that offer more individual communication than many of the structured activities in large or small groups" (p. 199) and are ideal for L2 immersion environments. As will be discussed, the éducatrices in the FFL child care centre made significant use of routines and gestures, particularly with new arrivals to the centre.…”
Section: Select Literature and Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with earlier reviews in different ECEC settings (Bialystok, 2018;Buysse et al, 2014), we concluded that research showed positive effects of foreign language ECEC on children's foreign language development (Bergström et al, 2016;Buyl & Housen, 2014;Cheour et al, 2002;Ferjan Ramírez & Kuhl, 2017Hidaka et al, 2012). In several studies, children mostly developed receptive skills in the foreign language (Łockiewicz et al, 2018, also see Rohde, 2010), which echoes other research in different bilingual ECEC contexts (Björklund et al, 2014;Prošić-Santovac & Radović, 2018). This might be linked to the young age of children, in which they are also still developing their first language.…”
Section: Summary Of Review Findingssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Meanwhile, "research in Europe has tried to find out whether findings so far concerning the beneficial impact of CLIL contexts are comparable with those reported in the literature on the results of Canadian immersion programs of different sorts" (Roquet & Pérez-Vidal, 2017, p. 490). The findings "related to L1 development and academic achievement in the L2 have been replicated, for the most part, in other regions of the world where similar programs with majority language students have been implemented" (Genesee, 2004, p. 551) along with the examples such as English immersion program at Katoh Gakuen in Japan (Bostwick, 2001) and the Swedish immersion program in Finland (Björklund, Màrd-Miettinen, & Savijärvi, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%