2021
DOI: 10.1515/text-2020-0051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swearing in informal spoken English: 1990s–2010s

Abstract: This paper investigates changes in swearing usage in informal speech using large-scale corpus data, comparing the occurrence and social distribution of swear words in two corpora of informal spoken British English: the demographically-sampled part of the Spoken British National Corpus 1994 (BNC1994) and the Spoken British National Corpus 2014 (BNC2014); the compilation of the latter has facilitated large-scale, diachronic analyses of authentic spoken data on a scale which has, until now, not been possible. A f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps this observed role of threat could explain the lack of gender differences in swearing. The current study has replicated some recent research suggesting that women's swearing habits are changing (Aijmer, 2018) but has contrasted much of the research which suggested that men swear more than women (Love, 2021) and are less offended by swearing (Bendixen & Gabriel, 2013). Despite the finding that women and men had similar swearing frequencies, qualitative results still revealed a discussion of swearing less or using weaker words in an attempt to perform femininity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Perhaps this observed role of threat could explain the lack of gender differences in swearing. The current study has replicated some recent research suggesting that women's swearing habits are changing (Aijmer, 2018) but has contrasted much of the research which suggested that men swear more than women (Love, 2021) and are less offended by swearing (Bendixen & Gabriel, 2013). Despite the finding that women and men had similar swearing frequencies, qualitative results still revealed a discussion of swearing less or using weaker words in an attempt to perform femininity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This could explain the long-debated gender differences in swearing. Perhaps the most studied example of social identity affecting swearing is gender, with multiple studies finding that men swear more than women (Love, 2021;Schweinberger, 2018;Selnow, 1985). Furthermore, there are differences between men and women's swearing beyond frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When it comes to direct and indirect language, research has shown that men are more direct in their speech as compared to women (Ebadi & Seidi, 2015;Kakolaki & Shahrokhi, 2016;Karjo & Wijaya, 2020;Mulac et al, 2001) The final aspect to be discussed is the avoidance of swear words that is said to be a feature of women's speech in Lakoff's theory. Many studies have shown that men use swear words more than women do (Karjo & Wijaya, 2020;Love, 2021;Monk-Turner & Sylvertooth, 2008;Newman et al, 2008;Shu'e & Yiting, 2019). Furthermore, a study conducted by Knirnschild (2019) involving 400 respondents to a survey and 10 respondents to an interview have found that the usage of swear words by women is regarded as more offensive as compared to when a man uses the same words.…”
Section: Gender Differences In Language Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it can be said that men tend to use swear words more frequently as compared to women because even though the male students in this study seem to avoid swear words while speaking with their teacher, they use profanities frequently with their friends. As mentioned by Love (2021), swearing is highly related to contextual factors such as gender, and as such, the gender of the interlocutor will affect the use of profanity in a particular conversation.…”
Section: Male Students' Language Usementioning
confidence: 99%