“…Change in load is considered in Area 1 and in Area 2 separately in Figures 9 and 10; the corresponding response is revealed in Figures 11 and 12 To explain the supremacy of the projected controlling methodology, the performance is compared with some of the published works for the same test system with similar objective function. GWO-PID (Guha et al, 2015), FA-PID) (Padhan et al, 2014), BFO-PID) (Sahu et al, 2015), genetic algorithm (GA-PID), hFA-PS-PID) (Sahu et al, 2015), dragonfly algorithm (DA) (Kouba et al, 2018), artificial bee colony (ABC) (Ranjitha et al, 2020) optimization, quasi-oppositional harmony search algorithm (QOHS) (Shiva et al, 2015), comprehensive learning PSO (CLPSO) (Guha et al, 2015), differential evolution with collaborative of mutation and crossover strategies (EPSDE) (Guha et al, 2015) and ZN-PID (Sahu et al, 2015) is implemented for the LFC of the same two-area system with similar objective function. Hence, the results obtained by the above methodologies were taken to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method of control where DP L is the load change; D is load damping constant; and R is speed droop.…”