2020 4th International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iceca49313.2020.9297432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Swarm Intelligence based Load Frequency Control of Two Area Thermal System – Comparative Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response provided by BESS when sudden change in load occurs is recorded in the Figures 16 and 17. The frequency deviancies in the existence of wind energy are (Shiva et al, 2015) 0.12 2.55 3.12 4.43 GWO-PID (Guha et al, 2015) 0.13413 1.06 3.17 3.34 EDSDE-PID (Guha et al, 2015) 0.1497 2.88 3.37 3.56 CLPSO-PID (Guha et al, 2015) 0.1569 1.89 3.6 3.8 hFA-PS-PID (Sahu et al, 2015) 0.2782 2.8 4.5 4 FA-PID (Padhan et al, 2014) 0.4714 4.25 5.49 4.78 BFOA-PID (Sahu et al, 2015) 0.4788 4.7 6.4 5.1 GA-PID (Sahu et al, 2015) 0.5513 6.9 8 5.7 ZN-PID (Sahu et al, 2015) 0.604 8.1 0.2 6.7 ABC-PID (Ranjitha et al, 2020) 0 IChimp provided improved convergence rate and search capability that performed well in LFC issue. The controller sustains dynamic performance and system stability by diminishing the consequence of numerous uncertainties and conflicts.…”
Section: Test System 2 -Ieee-39 Bus Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response provided by BESS when sudden change in load occurs is recorded in the Figures 16 and 17. The frequency deviancies in the existence of wind energy are (Shiva et al, 2015) 0.12 2.55 3.12 4.43 GWO-PID (Guha et al, 2015) 0.13413 1.06 3.17 3.34 EDSDE-PID (Guha et al, 2015) 0.1497 2.88 3.37 3.56 CLPSO-PID (Guha et al, 2015) 0.1569 1.89 3.6 3.8 hFA-PS-PID (Sahu et al, 2015) 0.2782 2.8 4.5 4 FA-PID (Padhan et al, 2014) 0.4714 4.25 5.49 4.78 BFOA-PID (Sahu et al, 2015) 0.4788 4.7 6.4 5.1 GA-PID (Sahu et al, 2015) 0.5513 6.9 8 5.7 ZN-PID (Sahu et al, 2015) 0.604 8.1 0.2 6.7 ABC-PID (Ranjitha et al, 2020) 0 IChimp provided improved convergence rate and search capability that performed well in LFC issue. The controller sustains dynamic performance and system stability by diminishing the consequence of numerous uncertainties and conflicts.…”
Section: Test System 2 -Ieee-39 Bus Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Change in load is considered in Area 1 and in Area 2 separately in Figures 9 and 10; the corresponding response is revealed in Figures 11 and 12 To explain the supremacy of the projected controlling methodology, the performance is compared with some of the published works for the same test system with similar objective function. GWO-PID (Guha et al, 2015), FA-PID) (Padhan et al, 2014), BFO-PID) (Sahu et al, 2015), genetic algorithm (GA-PID), hFA-PS-PID) (Sahu et al, 2015), dragonfly algorithm (DA) (Kouba et al, 2018), artificial bee colony (ABC) (Ranjitha et al, 2020) optimization, quasi-oppositional harmony search algorithm (QOHS) (Shiva et al, 2015), comprehensive learning PSO (CLPSO) (Guha et al, 2015), differential evolution with collaborative of mutation and crossover strategies (EPSDE) (Guha et al, 2015) and ZN-PID (Sahu et al, 2015) is implemented for the LFC of the same two-area system with similar objective function. Hence, the results obtained by the above methodologies were taken to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method of control where DP L is the load change; D is load damping constant; and R is speed droop.…”
Section: Test System 1 Two-area Interconnected Thermal Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swarm intelligence systems imitate the social behavior of birds, bees, and ants. Teir prominence stems from their capacity to successfully tackle real-world global optimization problems [29]. Diferent swarm intelligence algorithms such as Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) [30], Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO) [31], Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [32], Firefy Algorithm (FA) [33], and Chimp Optimization (CO) [34] are based on simple notions related to physical phenomena and evolutionary psychology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%