Swallowing Outcomes and Discharge Destinations in Acute Stroke Tube-Feeding Dependent Dysphagia Patients Treated With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation During Inpatient Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective Inpatient rehabilitation study comparing swallowing outcomes and discharge destinations in acute stroke tube-feeding dependent dysphagia patients treated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation and traditional dysphagia therapy versus those treated with only traditional dysphagia therapy. Design Retrospective case-control study including 359 patients with acute stroke having initial Functional Oral Intake Scale scores of 3 or lower (profound to severe tube-feeding dependent dysphagia). One hundred ninety participants received neuromuscular electrical stimulation with traditional dysphagia therapy, and 169 controls received only traditional dysphagia therapy. Treatment occurred in hourly sessions 5 d/wk. Main outcome measures were comparison of Functional Oral Intake Scale scores after treatment (N = 359) and comparison of discharge destinations (n = 267). Results The neuromuscular electrical stimulation posttreatment mean ± SD Functional Oral Intake Scale score was 4.21 ± 2.1 versus 2.94 ± 1.96 for controls (t = 5.85, P < 0.001). The neuromuscular electrical stimulation group posttreatment mean ± SD Functional Oral Intake Scale gain was 3.24 ± 2.26 points versus 1.87 ± 2.01 for controls (t = 6.05, P < 0.001). After treatment, 51.6% (98/190) neuromuscular electrical stimulation patients had minimal or no swallowing restrictions (Functional Oral Intake Scale scores = 5–7), whereas only 26.6% (45/169) controls improved with Functional Oral Intake Scale scores of 5–7 (χ2 = 23.3, P < 0.0001). Groups differed by discharge destinations: neuromuscular electrical stimulation having more discharges to community than controls, 60% versus 44% (χ2 = 9.16, P = 0.003), and neuromuscular electrical stimulation having fewer acute care transfers compared with controls, 8% versus 25% (χ2 = 32.7, P < 0.0001). Conclusions Neuromuscular electrical stimulation with traditional dysphagia therapy was associated with better discharge swallowing outcomes and Functional Oral Intake Scale scores than traditional dysphagia therapy alone during inpatient rehabilitation in treating acute stroke feeding tube–dependent dysphagia and was associated with more discharges to community and less transfers back to acute care.

Intermittent tube feeding for stroke patients with dysphagia: a meta-analysis and systematic review

“…In addition, in the future, through multidisciplinary cooperation with the nutrition department, taking into account the nutritional status of the patient before the illness, combined with different nutritional indicators and scales, a comprehensive evaluation of the patient's nutritional status can be made (40). Aspiration refers to the process of swallowing, reflux, and secretions invading the airway through the pharynx and glottis and reaching the trachea below the true vocal cord (41). Aspiration in stroke patients with dysphagia is mainly caused by laryngeal insufficiency and delayed movement of the pharyngeal reflex (42).…”

Relationship between the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and the Self-Efficacy Scale among Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Oral intake and nutritional status were assessed using the FOIS. Scores ranged from one to seven, with higher scores indicating better swallowing function ( Table 1 ) [ 28 ].…”

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Reduces Aspiration Pneumonia Rate in Stroke Patients with Enteral Feeding in Convalescent Rehabilitation Wards

“…[25][26][27][28][29] The FOIS is a well-established and reliable scale that is used internationally to evaluate a patient's capability for oral intake. [30][31][32] Body mass index (BMI; kg/ m 2 ) 33) was recorded on the dietitian's sheet. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was used to evaluate the level of ADL.…”