2002
DOI: 10.1006/bioe.2002.0068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SW—Soil and Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The slower reactions of P into more recalcitrant forms are not captured by this metric [53,54]. As evidenced by the P fraction data, annual soil P surpluses did not remain exclusively in the fast P-binding pools captured by the sorption isotherms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The slower reactions of P into more recalcitrant forms are not captured by this metric [53,54]. As evidenced by the P fraction data, annual soil P surpluses did not remain exclusively in the fast P-binding pools captured by the sorption isotherms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…) presenta la ventaja de permitir el cálculo de la capacidad de tamponamiento de P del suelo (PBC), que es la capacidad de un suelo para moderar los cambios de P soluble al añadir o extraer P del mismo (Moody, 2007). Por lo general, mayor PBC implica mayor adsorción de P y mayores demandas de fertilización anual para verificar respuesta significativa del cultivo, pero también que el suelo compensa durante mayor tiempo una misma tasa de extracción, o mayores tasas de extracción en intervalos equivalentes de tiempo (McGechan, 2002). Aunque desde un punto de vista cualitativo (porque en este trabajo no se ha estimado numéricamente la PBC) la mayor adsorción en marga a altas concentraciones de fertilizante implicaría una mayor PBC y, consecuentemente, habría que añadir mayores cantidades de estruvita o superfosfato a estos suelos al inicio del cultivo, estos suelos retendrían mayor cantidad de P. La compleja forma de la isoterma de la estruvita en el suelo de granodiorita no se ajustó a ninguno de los modelos descritos.…”
Section: Solubility and Adsorption Of Struvite Phosphorusunclassified
“…), has the advantage of allowing the calculation of soil P buffering capacity (PBC), which is the capacity of a soil to moderate changes in soluble P when adding or extract P from it (Moody, 2007). In general, higher PBC implies higher adsorption of P and higher annual fertilization demands to verify a significant response of the crop, but also that the soil compensates for a longer time the same extraction rate, or higher extraction rates in equivalent intervals of time (McGechan, 2002).…”
Section: Solubility and Adsorption Of Struvite Phosphorusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations