2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2947540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SVRPF: An Improved Particle Filter for a Nonlinear/Non-Gaussian Environment

Abstract: The performance of a particle filter (PF) in nonlinear and non-Gaussian environments is often affected by particle degeneracy and impoverishment problems. In this paper, these two problems are reassessed using the concepts of importance region (IR) selection and particle density (PD), where IR describes the distribution region of particles, and PD describes the density of particles in IR. Based on these two factors, a support vector regression PF (SVRPF) is proposed to overcome the problems from nonlinear and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the state-of-art particle filtering, the proposal density is approximated as an appropriate Gaussian density [21]- [23] and is accordingly characterized by its mean and its covariance. The proposal density may be defined locally or globally [21], [24] [25]. A globally defined proposal density generates all the particles at each time step [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the state-of-art particle filtering, the proposal density is approximated as an appropriate Gaussian density [21]- [23] and is accordingly characterized by its mean and its covariance. The proposal density may be defined locally or globally [21], [24] [25]. A globally defined proposal density generates all the particles at each time step [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of proposal density is further affected by: i) whether its shape is close to the unknown posterior PDF and ii) whether any multivariate integrals involved in computing its moments can be computed accurately in real time. The literature primarily uses Gaussian shape for the proposal density, while many contributions appeared in the literature by introducing different numerical approximation techniques [21]- [23], [25]- [28]. Similarly, the literature also witnesses many developments by advancing the resampling techniques [5], [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilks and Berzuini 26 proposed a particle dilution resampling algorithm based on the Markov chain. As a result, PF has gradually been accepted as a RUL prediction method with its wide applications in nonlinear and non‐Gaussian systems 27‐29 . PF is a Bayesian state estimation algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, PF has gradually been accepted as a RUL prediction method with its wide applications in nonlinear and non-Gaussian systems. [27][28][29] PF is a Bayesian state estimation algorithm. It uses some weighted particles to represent the posterior probability distribution of states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability density functions (PDFs) of parameters estimated in a dynamic system are usually non-Gaussian, and the measurement equation is highly non-linear. Although the PF is versatile and robust in handling nonlinear and non-Gaussian estimation problems [21,22], a well-known problem of degeneracy results in a poor estimation performance. The particle degeneracy problem in classical PF seriously limits its development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%