2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SVM-FuzCoC: A novel SVM-based feature selection method using a fuzzy complementary criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The water-absorption bands were discarded resulting in 191 bands, where 420 locations were selected and labeled into seven classes (wdcBands). Because this is an urban classification task, structural features (SF) can effectively improve the classification performance, as it has been proven by previous 47 . The new dataset (wdcBandsSF) comprises a total of 281 features (191 bands + 6×15 SF).…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The water-absorption bands were discarded resulting in 191 bands, where 420 locations were selected and labeled into seven classes (wdcBands). Because this is an urban classification task, structural features (SF) can effectively improve the classification performance, as it has been proven by previous 47 . The new dataset (wdcBandsSF) comprises a total of 281 features (191 bands + 6×15 SF).…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Researchers have proposed many single-view feature selection algorithms [16,25,27], which are classified into three kinds: Wrappers, Filters and Embedded methods [11]. The Wrapper methods evaluate the importance of features by estimating the performance of learned classifiers; the Filter methods select features according to several correlation criteria; the Embedding methods have an one-step learning process by combining feature selection and classification.…”
Section: Single-view Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in many real problems, the features from different views sometimes are redundant, irrelevant or even noisy. Traditional feature selection methods [16,25,27] have been developed to select the relevant features and eliminate the redundant features from a single feature space by a specific selection metric [13] and an efficient searching strategy [33] (See Section 2.2). However, they cannot be directly borrowed for multi-view data, since the multi-view data has multiple connected but different feature spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An efficient feature selection technique will be employed to reduce the highdimensionality of the recorded ultrasonic signal and provide a more descriptive and compact signal representation [10]. In addition to enhanced accuracy rates and dimensionality reduction, the method has reasonably low computational demands, being able to cope with the high-dimensional feature space.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%