2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SVM, ANN, and PSF modelling approaches for prediction of iron dust minimum ignition temperature (MIT) based on the synergistic effect of dispersion pressure and concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, a theory-guided LSTM was proposed for pipeline shutdown pressure predictions. Arshad et al (2021) combined machine learning and statistical methods to establish a variety of prediction models for predicting the minimum ignition temperature of iron dust. Wang et al (2019a) established a multivariate non-linear regression mathematical model using multiple influencing factors to predict the Sauter mean diameter.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, a theory-guided LSTM was proposed for pipeline shutdown pressure predictions. Arshad et al (2021) combined machine learning and statistical methods to establish a variety of prediction models for predicting the minimum ignition temperature of iron dust. Wang et al (2019a) established a multivariate non-linear regression mathematical model using multiple influencing factors to predict the Sauter mean diameter.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction technique employed in this study is based on machine learning. The existing popular research methods in machine learning include the GA-BP neural network model, Grey neural network model, BP neural network, extreme learning machine, support vector machine, artificial neural network, grid search algorithm, a gradient boosting decision tree, and generative time intervals imputation network (Huang et al, 2019;Tan et al, 2019;Arshad et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2022a;Liu et al, 2022;Weng and German Paal, 2022). However, the existing prediction methods are only applicable to data features with a single data quantity or evident data characteristic.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ARIMA methods mainly focus on linear chemical process data. To adapt to the nonlinear characteristics of chemical process data, some more flexible data prediction methods have been proposed, such as artificial neural network (ANN) [75], support vector machine (SVM) [76], and autoencoder (AE) [77]. However, these methods cannot effectively extract time series features.…”
Section: Early Prediction and Warningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal advantage of an ANN is in its ability to learn from the observed data and approximate a function [39]. Mostly, this technique is used as a black box approach to model the linear as well as complex non-linear systems [40][41][42]. In this study, the series-parallel structure of the NARX (nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous inputs) network is used to develop the ANN models for the top and bottom composition predictions.…”
Section: Development Of Ann Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%