2020
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1855341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SUVmax-based assessment of PET response shows a superior specificity to Deauville criteria for predicting recurrence in Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre‐ASCT PET‐CT findings are critically important for identifying prognosis in patients with R/R cHL. 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 For example, a previous study revealed that the findings from PET scan images were associated with PFS in patients with R/R cHL, which is consistent with the data from our study. Here, the 5‐year PFS rates of patients who achieved CR or PR before ASCT were 73.69% and 49.07%, respectively, although the 5‐year PFS rates of patients with SD and PD were 30%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pre‐ASCT PET‐CT findings are critically important for identifying prognosis in patients with R/R cHL. 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 For example, a previous study revealed that the findings from PET scan images were associated with PFS in patients with R/R cHL, which is consistent with the data from our study. Here, the 5‐year PFS rates of patients who achieved CR or PR before ASCT were 73.69% and 49.07%, respectively, although the 5‐year PFS rates of patients with SD and PD were 30%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, our study focused on the prognostic significance of PET/CT results. Pre‐ASCT PET‐CT findings are critically important for identifying prognosis in patients with R/R cHL 33–37 . For example, a previous study revealed that the findings from PET scan images were associated with PFS in patients with R/R cHL, which is consistent with the data from our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…First, the independence from the administered activity and body weight, overcoming the limits of other semi-quantitative parameters such as ΔSUVmax. Moreover, it allows the conversion of a visual qualitative scale (e.g., DS) to a continuous semi-quantitative one [ 23 , 24 ]. In addition, the definition of a semi-quantitative cutoff value simplifies the dichotomization of responder vs. no-responder patients at EoT-PET; however, caution should be made in the assessment of liver disease and diabetes, factors that may influence liver metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, their de nition of SUVpeak requires a dedicated software and is not measurable with standard workstations. It is not clear why the authors did not use SUVmax as a measure of residual uptake, as is common in other studies [17].…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 97%