2015
DOI: 10.18665/sr.22548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustaining the Digital Humanities

Abstract: Ithaka S+R is a strategic consulting and research service provided by ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways. Ithaka S+R focuses on the transformation of scholarship and teaching in an online environment, with the goal of identifying the critical issues facing our community and acting as a catalyst for change. JSTOR, a research and learning platform, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But collaboration remains challenging in digital humanities and digital curation alike (Abbott, ; Alexogiannopoulos et al, ; Benardou et al, ; Maron & Pickle, ; McCarty, ; Molloy, ; Waters, ). It depends on achieving common understandings of language and terminology, methods and research styles, and theories, outputs, and values (Siemens et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But collaboration remains challenging in digital humanities and digital curation alike (Abbott, ; Alexogiannopoulos et al, ; Benardou et al, ; Maron & Pickle, ; McCarty, ; Molloy, ; Waters, ). It depends on achieving common understandings of language and terminology, methods and research styles, and theories, outputs, and values (Siemens et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few contributions that constitute a reflection on the humanities infrastructure and place in the context of the academic organization (Fraistat, 2012;Maron and Pickle, 2014;Nowviskie, 2012), library spaces (Hartsell-Gundy et al, 2015;Kavanagh Webb, 2018;Wilson, 2020), and socio-material conditions (Foka et al, 2018;Pawlicka-Deger, 2020;Smithies, 2017;Svensson, 2018). In 2018, a group of scholars formed the Critical Infrastructure Studies initiative (CIStudies, n.d.), which aims to develop this nascent field that uses infrastructure as a critical lens for analysing socio-cultural concerns (Liu, 2018).…”
Section: Developing the Discussion On Humanities Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Nancy Maron and Sarah Pickle argue, DH is in an ideal position to demonstrate its impact. 71 DH resources are attractive and accessible to the public in a way that a dataset of scientific data simply cannot be. Not only have we built our resources so that they can be shared, but we can demonstrate that the public has been doing so, and indeed contributing to the content and intellectual endeavour of some digital projects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, models exist in the sciences and at the edges of the humanities, where in archaeology or, indeed, the biosciences, a discovery may be recorded and made public with only a short observation or note to contextualise it. This should be possible in disciplines such as literature and history as well, not to mention formats such as those developed by the Centre Virtuel de la Connaissance sur l'Europe, 71 or the CENDARI project's Archival Research Guide's 72 gesture toward how this sort of exchange might occur. This kind of 'light-touch' format is valuable not only for its flexibility and potential technical integration (for example, via services to uplift and expose significant named entities within and across works, thereby enhancing visibility in a targeted way for research), but also for the visibility it can bring to less-established scholars, or para-academics in 'alt-ac' (alternative-academic) style roles, or to work that is not best presented in one of the traditional formats.…”
Section: Research Data and The Evolving Communications Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation