1991
DOI: 10.2307/249639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustaining IT Advantage: The Role of Structural Differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
325
0
16

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 668 publications
(392 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
325
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to the contrary, other studies (e.g., Clemons and Row, 1991;Mata et al, 1995;Smith et al, 1996) suggest that, while IT can potentially create value for customers, and thereby provide competitive advantage, IT is viewed as a homogeneous resource and difficult to develop in a tailored, unique or heterogeneous way to produce competitive advantage by a company. Accordingly, IT is likely to become a product which becomes available to firms via imitation and acquisition, i.e., IT may become more like a commodity acquisition than a resource that can, alone, produce competitive advantage.…”
Section: Extent Of Managerial It Use and Firm Profitabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, to the contrary, other studies (e.g., Clemons and Row, 1991;Mata et al, 1995;Smith et al, 1996) suggest that, while IT can potentially create value for customers, and thereby provide competitive advantage, IT is viewed as a homogeneous resource and difficult to develop in a tailored, unique or heterogeneous way to produce competitive advantage by a company. Accordingly, IT is likely to become a product which becomes available to firms via imitation and acquisition, i.e., IT may become more like a commodity acquisition than a resource that can, alone, produce competitive advantage.…”
Section: Extent Of Managerial It Use and Firm Profitabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If new entrants can't raise their own barriers, then in the long run new ITs will become competitive necessities rather than a source of sustainable advantage [10]. With no first-mover advantage or barriers to duplication, firms that capitalize on a new IT will be vulnerable to incumbents or new entrants, leading to competition where the benefits of an innovation bring market efficiency but not higher rents for the sellers.…”
Section: Technology and Newly-vulnerable Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, if there are no barriers to replication of an innovation, followers will benefit from the experience of the first-mover and innovations will diffuse across competitors, leaving the first-mover with the sunk costs of experimentation, research, and development [29]. Second, followers may learn from the experience of the first-mover and enter the market with a better product and a more agile, less costly technology infrastructure [10].…”
Section: Technology and Newly-vulnerable Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, process-level value flows will be observed, consisting of increased process efficiencies, that are reflected in cost savings and improved product quality (Barua, et al, 1995;Brynjolfsson & Hitt 1995;Srinivasan et al, 1994;Lee & Clark 1996). Second, market-level value flows will also occur, based on the extent to which the business model offers sustainable competitive advantage (Clemons, 1991;Clemons & Row, 1991b;Teece, 1987). In some cases, another market-level value flow is generated by positive network externalities that increase the value of the technology for all of the firm's technology adopters, as more adopters join the network (Katz & Shapiro, 1986;Kauffman et al, 1999).…”
Section: Relevant Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See, for example, Brynjolfsson & Hitt, 1998;Chircu & Kauffman, 2000b;Clemons & Row, 1991b;Davern & Kauffman, 2000;Leonard-Barton, 1988;Teece, 1987) Recent theoretical perspectives on technology investments also point out that successful implementation requires firms to reengineer their processes to enable the new capabilities of the technology in which they invest (Barua, Lee & Whinston, 1996;Brynjolfsson & Hitt, 1998;Lee & Clark, 1996).…”
Section: Relevant Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%