2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustained unresponsiveness to peanut after long-term peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This long-lasting protection may have clinical correlates in establishing a state of non-responsiveness to allergens, whereby patients remain desensitized despite discontinuation of AIT. Promisingly, two initial studies of patients with peanut allergy who had been treated with long-term EPIT and then discontinued for 2 months demonstrated transient non-responsiveness of peanut after treatment [ 97 , 99 ]. Of note, the duration of protection after discontinuation of therapy demonstrated in this setting is limited in comparison to the long-term protection conferred by SCIT and SLIT in grass pollen allergy.…”
Section: Epicutaneous Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This long-lasting protection may have clinical correlates in establishing a state of non-responsiveness to allergens, whereby patients remain desensitized despite discontinuation of AIT. Promisingly, two initial studies of patients with peanut allergy who had been treated with long-term EPIT and then discontinued for 2 months demonstrated transient non-responsiveness of peanut after treatment [ 97 , 99 ]. Of note, the duration of protection after discontinuation of therapy demonstrated in this setting is limited in comparison to the long-term protection conferred by SCIT and SLIT in grass pollen allergy.…”
Section: Epicutaneous Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bystander effect was hypothesized to be linked to the hypermethylation of the Gata3 promoter, involved in Th2 differentiation, with consequent downregulation of Th2 cytokines including IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, as well as hypomethylation and upregulation of Foxp3 . These epigenetic modulations are also hypothesized to mechanistically influence the durable clinical protection conferred by EPIT [ 99 ].…”
Section: Epicutaneous Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPIT was generally well-tolerated apart from moderate local skin reactions [49 ▪ ]. Sustained unresponsiveness to peanut has also been demonstrated following two to three years of EPIT [50 ▪▪ ].…”
Section: Gut–skin Axis In Therapeutic Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…After 12 months of treatment, nearly twice as many participants treated with the peanut patch had a maximum symptom severity of “none” or “mild” compared with placebo participants (31.1% vs. 16.5%, respectively), and fewer subjects treated with the peanut patch had a maximum severity score of “severe” across these systems (16.2% vs. 27.5% of placebo participants, p = 0.019). There is also evidence from a small group of patients in both VIPES and PEPITES that EPIT with Viaskin may induce sustained unresponsiveness in a subgroup of patients ( 106 , 112 ). In both studies, a subgroup of eligible participants treated with the peanut patch for 36 months underwent 2 months without treatment, followed by a DBPCFC.…”
Section: Viaskin As the Most Clinically Advanced Approach To Epitmentioning
confidence: 99%